Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tony Snow tears the LID off of the TRUTH behind Saddam and Al Qaeda...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:02 PM
Original message
Tony Snow tears the LID off of the TRUTH behind Saddam and Al Qaeda...
...except he's lying through his fucking Fox News teeth, as well as ignoring the recent reports saying there was NO relationship, and Saddam hated those assholes MORE than the US...but other than that, TONY rips the ever-lovin', mother-effin' LID off the TRUTH, BAY-BEE!

Jesus, I'm SICK of this crap...

Snow Ignores Intel Report, Claims There Was A "Relationship" Between Saddam And Al Qaeda...

White House | Posted September 12, 2006 05:04 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/09/12/snow-ignores-intel-report_n_29286.html

From today's White House Press briefing

Watch the video at Thinkprogress.org

Q Well, one more, Tony, just one more. Do you believe -- does the President still believe that Saddam Hussein was connected to Zarqawi or al Qaeda before the invasion?

MR. SNOW: The President has never said that there was a direct, operational relationship between the two, and this is important. Zarqawi was in Iraq.

Q There was a link --

MR. SNOW: Well, and there was a relationship -- there was a relationship in this sense: Zarqawi was in Iraq; al Qaeda members were in Iraq; they were operating, and in some cases, operating freely from Iraq. Zarqawi, for instance, directed the assassination of an American diplomat in Amman, Jordan. But they did they have a corner office at the Mukhabarat? No. Were they getting a line item in Saddam's budget? No. There was no direct operational relationship, but there was a relationship. They were in the country, and I think you understand that the Iraqis knew they were there. That's the relationship.

Q Saddam Hussein knew they were there; that's it for the relationship?

MR. SNOW: That's pretty much it.

Q The Senate report said they didn't turn a blind eye.

MR. SNOW: The Senate report -- rather than get -- you know what, I don't want to get into the vagaries of the Senate report, but it is pretty clear, among other things, again, that there were al Qaeda operators inside Iraq, and they included Zarqawi, they included a cleric who had been described as the best friend of bin Laden who was delivering sermons on TV. But we are simply not going to go to the point that the President is -- the President has never made the statement that there was an operational relationship, and that's the important thing, because I think there's a tendency to say, aha, he said that they were in cahoots and they were planning and doing stuff; there's no evidence of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Guess what. The 19 hijackers were operating in the US for months
Does that mean Bush sponsored them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. and it's pretty obvious...
...Junior's junta ordered the FBI et al to turn a blind eye towards them...so, yeah, that sounds like more of a relationship than Iraq had with al-Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. So basically just like the 911 hijackers being here....
we knew they were here (PDB made clear and the FBI and CIA may have known a cell was here) but there was no operational relationship between our gov't and them. Sounds like what he is saying about Iraq and Al Qaeda. Should we invade ourselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would like to meet "Mr. Snow" in a dark alley...
he's got a bad case of "smarminess" and I think that I could help him with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. my gawd---talk about parsing words!



MR. SNOW: The President has never said that there was a direct, operational relationship between the two, and this is important. Zarqawi was in Iraq.my
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tony Snow ...
His is not to reason why,
His is just to lie, lie, lie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. They keep bringing up Zarqawi
Nobody ever mentions that Bush let Zarqawi go three times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. "I don't want to get into the vagaries of the Senate report,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The equivalent of Little Scotty McClellan's...
..."I'm not going to discuss the details of an ongoing investigation."

Damn thing about facts...they get in the way of lies

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. That jumped out at you too?
Okay Tony, enough of the "vagaries" of the Senate report; how about the specifics, which say that your boss is a lying sack of shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. its talk like this that will only fuel the coming impeachment proceedings
so i say let the poor fool rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lies. Here are a couple of bush's remarks-
From Levin's e-mail:

On September 25, 2002, the President said “Al-Qaida hides. Saddam doesn’t, but the danger is that they work in concert. The danger is that al-Qaida becomes an extension of Saddam’s madness and his hatred and his capacity to extend weapons of mass destruction around the world.” And then he said “You can’t distinguish between al-Qaida and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror.”
...
On 14, 2002, the President said “This is a man that we know has had connections with al-Qaida. This is a man who, in my judgment, would like to use al-Qaida as a forward army.”


Please explain HOW one uses "al-Qaida as a forward army" WITHOUT having an "operational relationship", Toe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. The only question is whether the ICC will spare Tony or not.
He should shut up while he is ahead. If he continues to lie in this fashion people may get the impression he is nothing more than a propagandist for an evil imperial dictatorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I hope the miserable bastard is burned at the stake.
I've said it before, I will say it again...in reference to Tony Snow, Laura Ingraham, Lee Atwater...

"Having cancer doesn't mae you a "good" person or a "bad" person. It makes you a person with cancer."

Tony Snow had cancer. He was treated for it, and he survived. Today, he is a lying, arrogant motherf**ker.

For whatever that is worth.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC