Will * be subject to the involuntary return to duty in January, 2009?

[TechBear_Seattle]

Even the White House admits that * was let out of his commitment to the National Guard early. Does anyone know if Chimpy still has any years left on his military contract? If so, any thoughts on forcing him to return to the National Guard and serve in Iraq with the rest of his new unit?

[Virginia Dare]

1. Like all of his other fuck ups...

Poppy will wave his magic wand and make it go away.

[TechBear_Seattle]

2. So only the poor and unpriviledged are subject to involuntary recall?

I think this is a valid question. If we get a Democrat with some actual balls (or tits, as the case may be) as a national candidate, I think the question should be raised. I mean, if it sauce for the poor and underpriviledged goose....

[Virginia Dare]

3. If that were the case...

then he would have had his stupid ass shot off in Viet Nam years ago. Unfortunately money and privilege buys alot in this country, especially if you're from a family as rich and as powerful as the Bush's.

It sucks, but at this point in time that's the way it is. Just about everybody in Washington can be bought at some price.

[AZBlue]

4. "Return to duty" implies he was there to begin with!

[TechBear_Seattle]

5. That is beside the point

:hi:

He was enlisted, and it has been acknowledged that he left early (the only dispute is exactly how early.) The question at hand is: does he still have time on his military contract and thus can be unceremoniously yanked to the front once he leaves office?