Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Three 'talking points' the NSA wants the Senate Intel Cmte to use:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 07:01 PM
Original message
Three 'talking points' the NSA wants the Senate Intel Cmte to use:
•“I have personally met the dedicated men and women of the NSA. The country owes them an enormous debt of gratitude for their superb efforts to keep us all secure.”

•“I can say that the program must continue. It has detected plots that could have resulted in death or injury to Americans both at home and abroad.”

•“It is being run in a highly disciplined way that takes great pains to protect U.S. privacy rights. There is strict oversight in place, both at the NSA and outside, now including the full congressional intelligence committees.”


NSA ‘talking points’ rile up Democrats

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/nation/15...

WASHINGTON | Democrats want the National Security Agency to stick to snooping, not what they allege is politicking.

The spy agency recently sent the Senate Intelligence Committee a list of approved talking points about its warrantless eavesdropping program.

The panel’s seven Democrats bridled, alleging in a letter to the agency’s director that the document was riddled with “subjective statements that appear intended to advance a particular policy view and present certain facts in the best possible light.”

They are accusing the supersecret agency of inappropriately engaging in policy debate. Intelligence agencies are supposed to stay out of politics.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. But why are you insisting on doing it without a warrant?
•“I have personally met the dedicated men and women of the NSA. The country owes them an enormous debt of gratitude for their superb efforts to keep us all secure.”
What does have have to do with them getting a warrant first?

•“I can say that the program must continue. It has detected plots that could have resulted in death or injury to Americans both at home and abroad.”
Why can't it continue while getting warrants first?

•“It is being run in a highly disciplined way that takes great pains to protect U.S. privacy rights. There is strict oversight in place, both at the NSA and outside, now including the full congressional intelligence committees.”
They wouldn't have to if they got warrants first.

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. you gotta be wearing the super secret nsa decoder ring
for it all to make sense.

1- I have personally been showed the voyeur clips of me cheating on my wife, by the dedicated men at the nsa.

2- I can say that the program will continue. it has detected graft and corruption of american politicians that will place them at danger both at home and abroad.

3- it is being ran in a highly partisan way that takes great pains to protect the elites blackmail rights. there is authoritarian oversight in place, both at the nsa and outside, now including the full congressional republicans.

your official decoder ring may be purchased for a untraceable campaign donation dropped at a location to be determined.

a reasonable facsimile may be obtained by removing the scales from ones eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. what's the harm in some words designed to manipulate the public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC