Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Graham Reacts to Presidential Address

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 12:46 AM
Original message
Graham Reacts to Presidential Address
(Washington, D.C.) – U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham made a statement on the Presidential news conference Friday.

Graham also released a letter addressed to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asking for clarification of the United States response should a situation arise involving a CIA paramilitary operative captured in Iran and placed on trial in that country.


Graham's letter stated:

"This is a time for thoughtful, reasoned discussions. What we do today will affect the nation not only in our current war but in future wars as well.

"President Bush is sincere in wanting the tools necessary to protect the nation, including a viable CIA program. I share that goal and will provide those tools without eroding Geneva Convention protections necessary in this and future wars.

"The Senate legislation, for the first time, clearly defines what would be criminal conduct by the CIA in the War on Terror.

"It gives the CIA guidance that is long overdue. It also prevents CIA agents and their families from being sued for performing their duties on behalf of the nation.

"The legislation clearly states the only law used to create civil or criminal liability for the CIA will be American law, not foreign law.

"The legislation clears up confusion in American criminal law regarding detainee treatment standards and I am very proud of that fact.

"Protecting CIA agents and programs from ill-defined criminal prosecution and legal liability is something all Americans should strive to achieve. The Senate bill achieves these goals without destroying Geneva Convention protections for our troops.

"Weakening the Geneva Convention protections is an unnecessary step and will put our military members and others defending our nation at risk by jeopardizing the protections they currently are provided.

"What is being billed as 'clarifying' our treaty obligations will be seen as 'withdrawing' from the treaty obligations. It will set precedent which could come back to haunt us."

http://www.wltx.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=41997
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, it sure doesn't sound like Linsey is backing down! I don't think
McCain will either. I'm a bit concerned aobut Warner because he's objected to things in the past and caved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. they (the "rebels")
can't afford to back down.

too much at stake, and the country isn't on Chimpolini's side.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wagthedogwar Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. We don't need no stinkin' foreigners tellin' us we can't torture
"The legislation clearly states the only law used to create civil or criminal liability for the CIA will be American law, not foreign law.


--read: Belgium can't put Bush on trial like we put Saddam or Noriega on trial.


Must be a relief for all war criminals; Adolf Eichmann should have moved to Texas where one is free to torture at will.

Carry on boys! good Xtrians love to torture infidels too, who knew?

Bush & Bin Laden, same shit, different religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well Warner knows about cruel and unusual punishment...
He once married Liz Taylor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. and big puff of wind has ended in a whimper
POS candy ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hey Grahammy...

..."thanks for stickin up fer me!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Does it really matter what Congress passes as a Bill?
If Busholini doesn't wish to follow certain parts he will merely draw up a "Signing Statement" that allows him to do what he wants to do.

America is now a Fascist State, sliding rapidly toward a Fascist Police State. The RW Fascists love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC