Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Path to 911, Repud Incumbents, and Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 08:08 AM
Original message
The Path to 911, Repud Incumbents, and Afghanistan
I'm wondering if the right-wing propaganda movie 'The Path to 9/11' can be used to our advantage because it stirred up old history, at least as far as some Repud incumbents are concerned.

Some of those birds were in office while al Qaeda was working on the 9/11 plot, some were in office when al Qaeda set off its bombs in Kenya and Tanzania, and some were in office while the Taliban was kicking the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan.

So the questions should again be asked: why didn't these very same Republican solons offer their support for former president Clinton's anti-terror initiatives? Why didn't these Republicans vote to better fund the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan back in the 1990's? Why did these same GOPster congress-critters think that removing former president Clinton from office was more important than fighting al Qaeda; was party loyalty more important than fighting terrorists?

We here may know the answers. However, many recently-aroused voters ought to be made aware of the questions--and the answers.

We also know that these Repuds don't deserve free passes again, any more than they did back in 2000, 2002, and 2004.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChipsAhoy Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. The 9/11 Show didn't show Clinton in a positive light
Actually, it was the Clinton Administration they showed in a poor light. They made it seem like they had Osama by the short hairs and did nothing about it. That's why Clinton was so upset about it being aired. It was surely in poor taste!!! How it could be turned around to serve us is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of Course It Didn't
Of course The Path to 9/11 showed former president Clinton in a bad light. It was a right-wing propaganda piece. However, I don't see that whenever some Republiclown tries to use clips from Nowrasteh's waste of cinematography, a Democratic response team couldn't respond with a voice-over and graphics showing how Republiclown Congressman Howdy Bubba behaved after the East African embassy bombings, how Congressman Howdy Bubba (R) voted on authorizing the Clinton administration's security poses, or how Congressman Howdy Bubba (R) voted on the recommendations of the Hart Commission on airline security.


The US is heading down a long, dark, bleak road. The problem with all too many of us Democrats is that we are all too willing to cede control of recent political history to the right-wing Republican/"conservative" noise machine. After twelve years of Republican control of at least one house of Congress, six years of Republican control of both Congress AND the White House,we are seeing the results of allowing Newscorp, WND, NewsMax, Horowitz, Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity, and the rest of the right-wing rogue's gallery to narrate our history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC