Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

playing catch-up with Dean?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 05:15 AM
Original message
playing catch-up with Dean?
this is NOT intended to start a flame war, and is not intended to slight or endorse any candidate - it's just something that occured to me and I'm tossing it out

The momentum around Dean occured because of the amount of anger people feel about Bush, and the level of frustration people have regarding the Democratic Party's handling of the 2000-selection, taxcuts, environmental trashing, Iraq etc. In other words the Dems were/are seen as bowing to the wishes of the naked emperor. We've all posted at one time or another about how "spineless" the Dems seem when it came to standing up to Bush

In comparison to most (Braun, Sharpton, Clark excluded) of the other Dem candidates - Dean is in the position of not having to "vote" on any of these issues, whereas Gephardt, Lieberman, Edwards, Kerry, Kuchinich and former candidate Graham did have to "vote"

Did it ever occur to anyone out there that if the Dem's (candidates and the party as a whole) had taken strong (or stronger) measures to defeat/oppose Bush prior to the nomination race (with the same vigor that they are now attacking Dean) - that these candidates wouldn't have to play catch-up to Dean now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of Course, Dean stood out b/c he was willing to call the GOP on their shit
That is what attracted me to him in the first place. He did it first and he did it when the other Dems were particularly spineless. Now they are pissed that they are all behind in the polls, boo hoo, they lost their chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sure it did
Edited on Fri Dec-26-03 05:38 AM by eileen_d
But it has also occurred to me that as a governor, Dean had certain luxuries that Democratic senators did not. So I factored that into my equation, looked at the candidates' long term records and positions on the issues, and came out a Kerry supporter. However, I got tired of hearing Kerry talk about Dean all the time. I don't particularly want to hear about Dean anymore, which is why I support Clark and Kucinich.

True story. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. when Dean's campaign started taking off
because he was the only one out there that was "attacking" Bush, most of the other candidates pooh-poohed Dean's campaign - but as the momentum grew, they jumped on the attack-Bush band wagon. However, at that point, it was too little too late for most of them and apparent that they were following Dean's lead

dispite the DLC/DNC "warnings" about Dean - he still gathered momentum

when jumping on the attack-Bush band wagon didn't work, they turned to attacking Dean

On the original line-up of candidates, I saw the race coming down to Kerry or Dean, then added Clark to the list when he jumped in

The attacks on Dean may take their toll or he may flame himself. Kerry still has to find his "hook" to bring in more supporters.

I'm leaning towards Clark at the moment - but that could change at anytime.

as far as the issues go - essentially all the Dem's are saying the same thing, it's just the "method" of implementing their plans that are different - and as we all know, what a candidate says on the trail is vastly different from what and how a plan is put into action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Mighty Boot Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Exactly.
Where were they? They did their constituents the
ultimate betrayal when they caved to the hypocritical
skunks of the Gloating Obfuscators Party. So that we
wouldn't "soil this man's reputation" or whatever
that thingamajig Scalia said about AWOL *. Well, F
them in the face, so much damage has been done by
Chimpleton and his minions that I'm ready to revolt
if that piece of garbage is still in the Whore House
a year from now. I'm ABB of course but I want my candidate
to be right in their face with a repudiation of each and
every lie. They need to pick up the megaphone and get it
done. And wherever the "Electoral College " is, I hope
it caves in due to mine subsidence.

Incidentally, Merry Christmas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. welcome to DU
if you are new. Glad to have you here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Mighty Boot Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. thanks
Edited on Fri Dec-26-03 06:56 AM by The Mighty Boot
I'm not-I lurked for a long while and may go
dormant again but the flaming had me so sick
that I just wanted to contribute to try to
balance things a little.


on edit:

I live about 5 miles from Cheswick, Pa.
Ever heard of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. of course
Edited on Fri Dec-26-03 06:43 AM by Cheswick
even people who don't follow politics the way we do have remarked to me that they are interested in Dean because he seems to be the only one "telling it like it is".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, you're describing my dad here
He's a very disillusioned Republican - starting back with Bush the Elder. Dean got his attention just as you described.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC