George Bush is a Coward

[Stinky The Clown]

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is in New York to address the UN. Little George is in New York to address the UN. Word is, Mahmoud asked Little George if he wanted to .... you know .... hang out .... talk some shit ...... a falafel or a pizza, maybe.

Anyway, as crazy as Mahmoud is, Little George isn't gunna go hang with him. What I heard is ..... Mahmoud could kick Little Georgie's ass.

On a more serious note. Why, exactly is Bush not going to take thiks *perfect* chance to engage an assumed enemy in some dialog while on neural territry? Any true national leader would. George Bush won't. George Bush is a coward.

[stepnw1f]

1. He is a Coward Like His Supporters

All talk and no action.

[Vincardog]

3. All hat and no cowboy

[Fridays Child]

2. Bill Clinton would have done it...

...but he's a world class communicator and it was never his goal to leave bloody American bootprints across the globe. King George, on the other hand, knows only how to beat his chest and drop bombs.

[NeedleCast]

4. If clinton had talked to him...

I hope he would have asked him the hard questions.

Why are you closing news papers around your country?
Why are you firing professors at your colleges?
Why are liberal minded people in your country being disappeared?

The enemy of your enemy is not always your friend.

[cleveramerican]

5. the wise leader knows......

that sometimes much can be gained from even the most casual contact with other leaders.

[pretzel4gore]

7. if you had the usa/britain/israel gunning for you

darn right you'd control the pro corporate press, fire pro western profs and get ridda western agents whenever you catchem (and do it quietly, to avoid giving west pigmedia ammo to further demonize iran)....
if the iran gov didn't do the things you mention, they'd be guilty of dereliction of duty!

[NeedleCast]

9. So you're saying

when limiting freedom, the ends justify the means? How is Ahmadinajhad different from Bush? Both will do whatever they can to stay in power.

Saying that it's okay to limit my freedom of press, my freedom of speech to make my country more secure is the death of freedom.

"Those who would give up a little freedom in exchange for a little secuirty will have niether."

[pretzel4gore]

13. again, the difference is the usa is richest most powerful

on earth, while iran is fairly innocuous militarily.....thus their leaders operate according to vastly different moral imperatives. the iranian leader could easily lose his life (and tens/thousands of fellow iranians) in open conflict with the usa, whereas bush? bush wouldn't miss a $3000 dollar a plate lunch, or a minute's sleep.....indeed bush would gain from any conflict

[maxsolomon]

6. someone needs to talk to him

seriously.

and i don't know which president i mean.

[bluedog]

8. damn right hes a yellow belly

can't speak to the man face to face...........but once he gets back on TV he'll spout his royal lying mouth off about him............now thats not a man...........can't say anything to his face?.............then bush should STFU on TV........

[orpupilofnature57]

10. " An errand sent to collect a bill ,by a bunch of clerks " col. Kurtz

Poppy though elected only once, has been a fixture forever.Shrub is an inevitability, of The Good Old Boy Network ,that and our looking down our noses at a real leader ,whilst Poppy combined technique and called in favors .

[lvx35]

11. Because he doesn't want peace, in a nutshell.

That's why he won't talk to him. Bush wants to wipe out the "axis of evil" all else be damned.

[Arkham House]

12. I think you've hit the nail on the head...

...in more ways than one. Indeed. The fact that the President of the United States is a coward is something unique, I think...a situation we've never faced before. A sadistic bully, who enjoys hitting at people whom he knows can't hit back. A nation can survive any sort of leader--except a coward...God help us the next two years. The worst is yet to come...