Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry's speech on values, moral truths and respect for human dignity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:04 AM
Original message
Kerry's speech on values, moral truths and respect for human dignity
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 08:04 AM by ProSense
Thank you. It’s wonderful to be here. For some time, I have looked forward to this opportunity to come here to talk about my faith, and the role of faith in public life. And I’m very grateful to Pepperdine—an institution explicitly founded to shine the light of God’s truth through the service of its graduates—for giving me this opportunity.

There will always be those bent on corrupting our political discourse, particularly where religion is involved. But I learned how important it is to make certain people have a deeper understanding of the values that shape me and the faith that sustains me. Despite this New Englanders’ past reticence of talking publicly about my faith, I learned that if I didn’t fill in the picture myself, others would draw the caricature for me. I will never let that happen again—and neither should you, because no matter your party, your ideology, or your faith, we are all done a disservice when the debate is reduced to ugly and untrue caricatures....

I believe these questions can be gathered around four issues where people of faith from every background can work together with other people of good will towards public policies that contribute to the common good.

The first and perhaps most obvious common challenge is to take practical steps to address global issues of poverty, disease, and despair.

Snip...

A second common challenge arises from the deep concern virtually all people of faith are enjoined to maintain toward sustaining and protecting God’s first creation. Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians 10:20 says, “The earth is the Lord’s, and everything on it.” The Prophet Isaiah (66:2) says, “has not my hand made all these things, and so they came into being?”

Snip...

A third area where we can find common ground is on one of the most emotional cultural issues of all: abortion. Obviously the issue of abortion has been enormously divisive, but there is also no denying there is common ground. There are 1.3 million abortions each year in America. Everyone can agree that that is too many and on a shared goal of reducing the need for abortion in the first place. And I believe our first step is to unite and accept the responsibility of making abortion rare by focusing on prevention and by supporting pregnant women and new parents.

Snip...

The fourth and final example of where people of faith should accept a common challenge is perhaps the most difficult and essential of all: rekindling a faith-based debate on the issues of war and peace. All our different faiths, whatever their philosophical differences, have a universal sense of values, ethics, and moral truths that honor and respect the dignity of all human beings. They all agree on a form of the Golden Rule and the Supreme importance of charity and compassion.

http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=4212


Full text also here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/18/AR2006091801046.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. This sounds like Dennis Kucinich could have made this speech. It speaks
to the values I grew up with in MY early Catholic years that evolved into the liberal worldview I have today.

I have been an atheist since 1994. I am never offended by anyone's articles of faith until they use them to beat at whole sections of humanity.

Faith that urges the best in human beings' actions towards each other gets a big thumbs up from me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is one of his greatest speeches.
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 10:34 AM by ProSense
The flame of intolerance is being fanned by people who claim God as their own, and declare the rest of us sinners.

One only need look at the today's news to realize that something has gone drastically wrong, including a U.S. president who claims Jesus as his prophet, yet sanctioned torture!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. I loved his comments on war and religion
Both for what it said and because it contained things he has always said now framed in this spiritual framework. How many of these words has he said since 2002:

"For me, the just war criteria with respect to Iraq are very clear: sometimes a President has to use force to fight an enemy bent on using weapons of mass destruction to slaughter innocents. But no President should ever go to war because they want to—you go to war only because you have to. The words “last resort” have to mean something .

In Iraq, those words were rendered hollow. It was wrong to prosecute the war without careful diplomacy that assembled a real coalition. Wrong to prosecute war without a plan to win the peace and avoid the chaos of looting in Baghdad and streets full of raw sewage. Wrong to prosecute a war without considering the violence it would unleash and what it would do to the lives of innocent people who would be in danger."

In 2004, I thought he was speaking of "just war" in several comments. His comments on taking care of those in need sound extremely like what I heard when we looked at a Jesuit college with a daughter and they explained the Jesuit concept of Social justice.

I am amazed, but not surprised that he could articulate such a detailed intellectual spiritual framework. In some ways it isn't suprising. Even in 1971, he used many words and phrases that come from a religious moral background. The seriousness does make the point others on DU have made that the use of the word "immoral" is important, you can't go back from it - there are some who could use the word casually or for effect, Kerry is not among them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC