Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conn. Republican Lies To Claim Democratic Opponent Is "Wrong On Security"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 01:01 PM
Original message
Conn. Republican Lies To Claim Democratic Opponent Is "Wrong On Security"
Click here to read the whole post.

The ad in question is from Rep. Nancy Johnson (R-CT), who is running against state Senator Chris Muprhy.

<snip>

The ad says: Should the government intercept that call or wait until the paperwork is filed? Nancy Johnson says: ‘Act immediately. Lives may be at stake.’ Liberal Chris Murphy says: ‘No. Apply for a court warrant even if valuable time is lost.

But Murphy in truth just wants the government to follow FISA, which allows a warrant to be issued 72 hours after the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truckin Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here is my LTTE emailed to the Danbury News-Times last
Friday. It has not yet been published.

Johnson’s Ad is Blatantly Misleading

In a recent Nancy Johnson campaign ad, that was noted in The News-Times on 9/13/06, an announcer states the following false choices:

“A call is placed from New York to a known terrorist in Pakistan. A terrorist plot may be unfolding. Should the government intercept that call or wait until the paperwork is filed?”

The reality is that the call can be intercepted immediately and “paperwork” can be filed with the FISA court for up to 72 hours after the surveillance takes place. This enables the government to protect us by acting when they need to while allowing the FISA court to provide oversight so these powers are not abused.

Why is Nancy Johnson deceiving us with these false choices in her campaign ad? This is a dishonest attempt to scare Connecticut voters into voting for her. We do not need another deceptive politician in Washington and Johnson should be ashamed of this ad.

President Bush believes that he should not have to comply with this law and there should be no oversight over his actions. Apparently, Nancy Johnson agrees with the President and believes that our government should not be accountable to anyone when they listen to our calls.

Chris Murphy is a politician with integrity. He believes that the President should comply with the current law that allows the government to intercept calls when they need to but report to the FISA court after the surveillance of U.S. citizens has taken place. Murphy will not be a rubber stamp for the President’s failed and illegal policies and will support legislation that benefits the citizens of Connecticut. Please vote for Chris Murphy this November to hold the President accountable and help bring badly needed, positive change to our federal government.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. bravo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Great letter! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. That ad is HORRIBLE and pure speculation at best, as
Chris has never held a position in which he'd vote on those issues.

I think and hope that it will backfire on her. A lot of her success has been her image as a nice person. These are not the ads of a nice person. These are the ads of a very scared person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC