Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge's ruling may cause Fitz to dismiss perjury charges against Libby

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 09:47 PM
Original message
Judge's ruling may cause Fitz to dismiss perjury charges against Libby
Edited on Thu Sep-21-06 09:49 PM by dajoki
MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14941062/

Fitzgerald given way out of Libby CIA leak case
Judge says he can dismiss case if classified secrets will be revealed

By Joel Seidman
Producer
NBC News
Updated: 2:36 p.m. ET Sept 21, 2006

WASHINGTON - The judge in the CIA leak case ruled Thursday that if Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald feels that admitting certain classified documents at the upcoming trial of I Lewis "Scooter" Libby can jeopardize national security, Fitzgerald can then move to dismiss the perjury charges against Libby.

Judge Reggie Walton cannot automatically allow classified materials to be admitted at trial. He first must go through a series of closed hearings under CIPA regulations. CIPA, the Classified Information Procedures Act, protects and restricts the discovery of classified information in a way that does not impair the defendant's right to a fair trial. It also allows the government to propose a redacted version of a classified document as a substitution for the original, having deleted only non-relevant classified information.

In his ruling this morning, the Judge Walton, has given a technical legal victory to Libby's attorneys concerning the admissibility of classified materials they want to present at trial for their defense.

<<snip>>

Fitzgerald argues that because of the sensitive national security value of the classified materials, a special three part test must apply before determining if a document can be admitted at trial.

That test, according to Fitzgerald, must include: (1) that the document is relevant; (2) that the document is "helpful to the defense," and (3) that the defendant's interest in disclosure of the document outweighs the government's need to protect the classified information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh,goody!
Now they ALL can get away with outing a CIA officer,lying their asses off,getting the job done that they set out to do and STILL remain in their cushy little jobs to continue shitting on the constitution and the American people. Keep bending over America! We are getting the screwing of our lives. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChipsAhoy Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Indeed!
"and still remain in their cushy little jobs .........."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't this the defense that Libby was hoping for?
Basically, didn't he ask to look at some sensitive information, in the hopes that he would be unprosecutable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconocrastic Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-21-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. BTW - How is Plame's suit against Armitage doing?
Hasn't been in the news much lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC