Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Smacks Down Fox News - Hard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Vyan Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:19 AM
Original message
Clinton Smacks Down Fox News - Hard
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 11:36 AM by Vyan
In an interview for Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace takes on Bill Clinton over the issue of 9-11 and al-Qaeda using talking points taken from the ABC/Disney Smearumentary "Path to 9-11" -- and gets his head handed to him. (I've quoted so much of the interview because it's that good - and the likelyhood of Fox actually broadcasting all of this, where their correspondent is delivered a full on facial from Bill Clinton, is somewhere between slim and nil... Enjoy)

Full Inteview Transcript from Thinkprogress. Watch a Clip from Youtube.

WALLACE: When we announced that you were going to be on fox news Sunday, I got a lot of email from viewers, and I got to say I was surprised most of them wanted me to ask you this question. Why didn’t you do more to put Bin Laden and al Qaeda out of business when you were President. There’s a new book out which I suspect you’ve read called the Looming Tower. And it talks about how the fact that when you pulled troops out of Somalia in 1993, Bin Laden said I have seen the frailty and the weakness and the cowardice of US troops. Then there was the bombing of the embassies in Africa and the attack on the USS Cole.

CLINTON: OK..

WALLACE: …may I just finish the question sir. And after the attack, the book says, Bin Laden separated his leaders because he expected an attack and there was no response. I understand that hindsight is 20 20.

CLINTON: No let’s talk about…

WALLACE: …but the question is why didn’t you do more, connect the dots and put them out of business?

CLINTON: OK, let’s talk about it. I will answer all of those things on the merits but I want to talk about the context of which this…arises. I’m being asked this on the FOX network…ABC just had a right wing conservative on the Path to 9/11 falsely claim that it was based on the 911 commission report with three things asserted against me that are directly contradicted by the 9/11 commission report. I think it’s very interesting that all the conservative Republicans who now say that I didn’t do enough, claimed that I was obsessed with Bin Laden. All of President Bush’s neocons claimed that I was too obsessed with finding Bin Laden when they didn’t have a single meeting about Bin Laden for the nine months after I left office. All the right wingers who now say that I didn’t do enough said that I did too much. Same people.

They were all trying to get me to withdraw from Somalia in 1993 the next day after we were involved in black hawk down and I refused to do it and stayed 6 months and had an orderly transfer to the UN.

Some background: This is point both Clarke and Clinton make in thier book. It wasn't Bill Clinton's choice to enter Somalia in the first place - the operation was started until George H. W. Bush as was supposed to already be over before Clinton took office. Unfortunately there was a six-month delay before UN Peacekeepers could be brought in to take over the task of trying to feed the starving people. Somali Warlords like Adid had been stealing the food and using it as a bargining chip to consolidate his power and influence.

Clinton ordered him arrested.

The military conducted operations to capture Adid, but failed to locate him. Those operations were inteded to be carried out at night, but instead were done during the day - and Adid's men were watching. They laid a trap and took out two of our helicopters which shoulder-fired missles. Several of our troops were killed, one was captured. During the successful rescue operation of Durant, the captured helicopter pilot, thousands of Somalis were killed - but Clinton didn't order our troops to leave. They didn't "cut and run" the way that Reagan ran like a scared rabbit out of Beirut. They completed the mission and turned over control to the UN after six months, so when Clinton gets pissed when he's accused of being a coward in Somalia - he has good reason.

Clinton: Ok, now let’s look at all the criticisms: Black hawk down, Somalia. There is not a living soul in the world who thought that Bin laden had anything to do with black hawk down or was paying any attention to it or even knew al Qaeda was a growing concern in October of 1993.

WALLACE: …I understand…

CLINTON: No wait…no wait…Don’t tell me. You asked me why I didn’t do more to Bin Laden. There was not a living soul…all the people who criticized me wanted to leave the next day. You brought this up so you get an answer.

WALLACE: I’m perfectly happy to. Bin Laden says…

CLINTON: And secondly…

WALLACE: Bin Laden says…

CLINTON: Bin laden may have said that…

WALLACE: Bin Laden says it showed the weakness of the US…

CLINTON: It would have shown the weakness if we left right away but (bin Laden) wasn’t involved in that. That’s just a bunch of bull. That was about Mohammed Adid, a Muslim war lord murdering..thousands of Pakistani Muslim troops. We were all there on a humanitarian mission. We had not one mission — none — to establish a certain kind of Somali government or to keep anybody out. He was not a religious fanatic.

WALLACE: But Mr. President…

CLINTON: There was no Al Qaeda…

WALLACE: …with respect if I may. Instead of going through 93.

CLINTON: You asked you. It you brought it up.

WALLACE: May I ask a general question that you can answer. The 9/11 Commission, which you talk about, and this is what they did say, not what ABC pretended they said…

CLINTON: Wait, Wait…

WALLACE: …they said about you and 43 and I quote, “The US government took the threat seriously, not in the sense of mustering anything like that would be….to confront an enemy of the first, second or third rank”

CLINTON: That’s not true with us and Bin Laden…

WALLACE: …the 9/11 commission says…

CLINTON: Let’s look at what Richard Clarke says. You think Richard Clarke has a vigorous attitude about Bin Laden?

WALLACE: Yes I do

CLINTON: You do?

WALLACE: I think he has a variety of opinions and loyalties but yes.

CLINTON: He has a variety of opinion and loyalties now but let’s look at the facts. He worked for Ronald Regan. He was loyal to him. He worked for George Herbert Walker Bush and he was loyal to him. He worked for me and he was loyal to me. He worked for President Bush; he was loyal to him. They downgraded him and the terrorist operation. Now, look what he said, read his book and read his factual assertions — not opinions, assertions. He said we took vigorous action after the African embassies. We probably nearly got Bin Laden.

WALLACE: …

CLINTON: Now wait a minute…

WALLACE: ..cruise missiles..

CLINTON: I authorized the CIA to get groups together to try to kill him. The CIA was run by George Tenet who President Bush gave the medal of freedom to and said he did a good job.. The country never had a comprehensive anti terror operation until I came to office. If you can criticize me for one thing, you can criticize me for this, after the Cole I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban, and launch a full scale attack search for Bin Laden.

This would be the Delenda Plans (pdf) that were drawn up by Richard Clarke, a comprehensive Political and Military strategy for combating Al Qaeda. A plan which was presented to Condoleeza Rice as the incoming National Security Advisor, and she subsequently ignored - until after 9-11.
But we needed baseing rights in Uzbekistan which we got after 9/11. The CIA and the FBI refused to certify that Bin Laden was responsible while I was there. They refused to certify. So that meant I would have had to send a few hundred special forces in helicopters and refuel at night. Even the 9/11 Commission didn’t do that. Now the 9/11 Commission was a political document too. All I’m asking is if anybody wants to say I didn’t do enough, you read Richard Clarke’s book.



From Clarkes Book: In 1998, after the cruise missle attack on Bin Laden Clinton told Gen Hugh Shelton, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs...

"Hugh, what i think would scare the shit out of these al Qaeda guys more than any cruise missle... would be the sight of U.S. commandos, Ninja guys in black suits, jumping out of helicopters into their camps, spraying machine guns. Even if we don't get the big guys, it will have a good effect." Shelton looked pained. He explained that the camps were a long way away from anywhere we could launch a helicopter raid. Nonetheless, America's top military oficer agreed to "look into it".

But the fact is the Pentagon wasn't having any more of Clinton's "wild adventures" in Africa and the Middle-east - not after Somalia.

In October of 2000, Richard Clarke discussed the problem following the bombing of the Cole with Mike Sheehan, then the State Depts top Counter-terrorism official.
"What's it gonna take, Dick?" Sheehan demanded, "Who the shit do they think attacked the Cole, fuckin' Martians? The Pentagon brass won't let Delta go get bin Laden. Hell, they won't even let the Air Force carpet bomb the place. Does al Qeada have to attack the Pentagon to get their attention?"

Yes, that exactly what they needed to do. No, Clinton didn't get Bin Laden - but it wasn't for lack of effort on his part.

WALLACE: Do you think you did enough sir?

CLINTON: No, because I didn’t get him

WALLACE: Right…

CLINTON: But at least I tried. That’s the difference in me and some, including all the right wingers who are attacking me now. They ridiculed me for trying. They had eight months to try and they didn’t….. I tired. So I tried and failed. When I failed I left a comprehensive anti-terror strategy and the best guy in the country, Dick Clarke… So you did FOX’s bidding on this show. You did you nice little conservative hit job on me. But what I want to know..

WALLACE: Now wait a minute sir…

CLINTON:..

WALLACE: I asked a question. You don’t think that’s a legitimate question?

CLINTON: It was a perfectly legitimate question but I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked this question of. I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked why didn’t you do anything about the Cole. I want to know how many you asked why did you fire Dick Clarke. I want to know…

WALLACE: We asked..

CLINTON:..

WALLACE: Do you ever watch Fox News Sunday sir?

CLINTON: I don’t believe you ask them that.

WALLACE: We ask plenty of questions of…

CLINTON: You didn’t ask that did you? Tell the truth

WALLACE: About the USS Cole?

CLINTON: tell the truth.

WALLACE: I…with Iraq and Afghanistan there’s plenty of stuff to ask.

Gotcha!!!

CLINTON: Did you ever ask that? You set this meeting up because you were going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers because Rupert Murdoch is going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers for supporting my work on Climate Change. And you came here under false pretenses and said that you’d spend half the time talking about…

WALLACE:

CLINTON: You said you’d spend half the time talking about what we did out there to raise $7 billion dollars plus over three days from 215 different commitments. And you don’t care.

WALLACE: But President Clinton…

CLINTON:

WALLACE: We were going to ask half the question about it. I didn’t think this was going to set you off on such a tear .

CLINTON: It set me off on such a tear because you didn’t formulate it in an honest way and you people ask me questions you don’t ask the other side.

WALLACE: Sir that is not true…

CLINTON: …and Richard Clarke…

WALLACE: That is not true…

CLINTON: Richard Clarke made it clear in his testimony…

WALLACE: Would you like to talk about the Clinton Global Initiative?

CLINTON: No I want to finish this.

WALLACE: Alright

CLINTON: All I’m saying is you falsely accuse me of giving aid and comfort to Bin Laden because of what happened in Somalia. No one knew al Qaeda existed then…

WALLACE: Did they know in 1996 when he declared war on the US? Did no one know in 1998…

CLINTON: Absolutely they did

WALLACE: When they bombed the two embassies…

CLINTON:…

WALLACE: Or in 2000 when they hit the Cole.

CLINTON: What did I do? I worked hard to try and kill him. I authorized a finding for the CIA to kill him. We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody has gotten since.

Oooh, SNAP!
And if I were still president we’d have more than 20,000 troops there trying to kill him. Now I never criticized President Bush and I don’t think this is useful. But you know we do have a government that thinks Afghanistan is 1/7 as important as Iraq. And you ask me about terror and Al Qaeda with that sort of dismissive theme when all you have to do is read Richard Clarke’s book to look at what we did in a comprehensive systematic way to try to protect the country against terror. And you’ve got that little smirk on your face. It looks like you’re so clever…

WALLACE:

CLINTON: I had responsibility for trying to protect this country. I tried and I failed to get bin laden. I regret it but I did try. And I did everything I thought I responsibly could. The entire military was against sending special forces in to Afghanistan and refueling by helicopter and no one thought we could do it otherwise… We could not get the CIA and the FBI to certify that Al Qaeda was responsible while I was President. Until I left office. And yet I get asked about this all the time and they had three times as much time to get him as I did and no one ever asks them about this. I think that’s strange.

WALLACE: Can I ask you about the Clinton Global Initiative?

CLINTON: You can.

WALLACE: I always intended to sir.

CLINTON: No you intended to move your bones by doing this first. But I don’t mind people asking me. I actually talked o the 9/11 commission for four hours and I told them the mistakes I thought I made. And I urged them to make those mistakes public because I thought none of us had been perfect. But instead of anybody talking about those things. I always get these clever little political…where they ask me one sided questions… It always comes from one source. And so…

WALLACE:…

CLINTON: And so…

WALLACE: I just want to ask you about the Clinton Global Initiative but what’s the source? You seem upset?

CLINTON: I am upset because..

WALLACE: …and all I can say is I’m asking you in good faith because it’s on people’s minds sir. And I wasn’t…

CLINTON: There’s a reason it’s on people’s minds. That’s the point I’m trying to make. There’s a reason it’s on people’s minds because they’ve done a serious disinformation campaign to create that impression. This country only has one person who has worked…against terror…under Regan…only one, Richard Clarke. And all I’d say anybody who wonders whether we did wrong or right. Anybody who wants to see what everybody else did, read his book. The people on my political right who say I didn’t do enough spent the whole time I was president saying why is he so obsessed with Bin Laden. And that was wag the dog when he tried to kill him. My Republican sec of defense — and I think I’m the only person since World War II to have a Secretary of Defense from the opposite party — Richard Clarke, and all the intelligence people said that I ordered a vigorous attempt to get Osama Bin Laden and came closer apparently than anybody has since.

WALLACE: alright…

CLINTON: And you guys try to create the opposite impression when all you have to do is read Richard Clarke’s findings and you know it’s not true. It’s just not true. And all this business about Somalia — the same people who criticized me about Somalia were demanding I leave the next day. Same exact crowd..

WALLACE: one of the…

CLINTON: …So if you’re going to do this for gods sake follow the same standards for everybody.

WALLACE: I think we do sir

CLINTON: …be fair.

WALLACE: I think we do. One of the main parts of the global initiative this year is religious reconciliation. President Bush says that the fight against Islamic extremism is the central conflict of the century and his answer is promoting democracy and reform. Do you think he has that right?

CLINTON: Sure. To advocate democracy and reform in the Muslim world? Absolutely. I think the question is what’s the best way to do it. I think also the question is how do you educate people about democracy. Democracy is about way more than majority rule. Democracy is about minority rights, individual rights, restraints on power. And there’s more than one way to advance democracy but do I think on balance that in the end after several bouts of instability do I think it would be better if we had more freedom and democracy? Sure I do. …The president has a right to do it? Sure I do. But I don’t think that’s all we can do in the Muslim world. I think they have to see us try to get a just and righteous peace in the Middle East. They have to see us as willing to talk to people who see the world differently than we do.

Amen.

And there are other questions that need to be asked of the Bush Administration - such as what happened at Tora Bora? And while Bush is taking photo ops with Pakistani President Musharraf, is he asking him about the treaty with the Taliban he just signed? I thought if you weren't with us, you were against us.

Maybe, not so much - eh?

Vyan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go Bigdog Go Kick Butt and forget their names
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent Post, Vyan!
nominated and kicked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Look for this to hit major media all day Monday.
Or at least I HOPE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
50. It HAS hit the media -- and not in the way FOX wanted...
Clinton faults Bush for inaction on bin Laden
Published: Sunday, 24 September, 2006, 10:36 AM Doha Time


WASHINGTON: Former president Bill Clinton, angrily defending his efforts to capture Osama bin Laden, accused the Bush administration of doing far less to stop the Al Qaeda leader before the September 11 attacks.

In a heated interview to be aired today on Fox News Sunday, the former Democratic president defended the steps he took after Al Qaeda’s attack on the USS Cole in 2000 and faulted “right-wingers” for their criticism of his efforts to capture Osama bin Laden.

“But at least I tried. That’s the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now,” Clinton said when asked whether he had failed to fully anticipate bin Laden’s danger. “They had eight months to try, they did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelliebrat Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. isnt it interesting that
after this HUGE and wildly appropriate smackdown hits the internet last nite, today Osama bin Laden is reportedly 'dead' :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Well apparently he has only been dead for
a month. The news had to be held for just the right moment you know. That the news leaked on a weekend rather then in time for nightly news on Monday may show desperation about Clinton and also the anti-America, anti-freedom and anti-humanity terror bill..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. I can't wait to watch the whole interview but I refuse to watch it on
Fox. Thank goodness for the internet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holboz Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Yes - Look forward to seeing it on CrooksandLiars!
Go Bill!!!!!! Damn, he is pissed off! I wonder if Bill knows how to play "I'm Not Ready to Make Nice" on his saxophone?

I want to see that smackdown played over and over again on every media outlet AROUND THE WORLD!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
40. Yes, I'll be spending MY "Pox 'News' Sunday" with Crooks and Liars.
Just as I don't buy books by crooks, I don't patronize the offerings of these liars and cheats and scum and war criminal enablers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. WOW. k&r-7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Check and mate, Mr. Wallace
Do your homework next time, Chris. He asked question after question, and when the answers didn't line up with his preconceived notions, he wanted to move on to the next little trap. I don't think going in to the interrogation that Wallace thought Clinton was very intelligent. I'll bet he has a far different assessment now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Great report....
and great research :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great post, Vyan, but it is too long and has too many facts
and that's the problem with it! Most Americans want all the issues reduced to a sound bite. Bush is the grand master of that. Unfortunately, the truth cannot be reduced to a sound bite. Even the Bible has 66 books in it, and if Gawd could not reduce the truth to a sound bite, neither can we.

Keith Olbermann made a short mention of Chris Wallace's attempted ambush of Clinton on last night program. I am glad to see in your post what that was all about.

Thank you for posting this, Vyan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. Those who want the truth will go to the ends of the earth, and this long
post to get it. Jaw to the floor. Clinton kicked conservative ass. Good for him !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Disinformation campaign, Big Dog hits the nail on the head. Kick and Nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. I saw that live.

big dog was awesome. we will need him in the run up
to the november elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks, this is the best explanation I've read regarding Clinton's
response to bin Laden's and al Qaeda's attacks. If one doesn't have time to read Richard Clarke's book...this commentary explains it in a nut shell. THANKS!

I hope lots of Freepers are reading this! They might learn something. FACTS, not propaganda from Faux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks for posting this!!
The extra transcript posted here really flushes out the full ass-whoopin applied to Wallace's fake news RW spin show.

Clinton was in rare form - about time someone showed how it ought to be done when ambushed on the Faux "news" RW commentary channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Please tell me that someone recorded this. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Does this air tomorrow? If so, I'm skipping church!!
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Can't you tape it?
I can't believe this is a good time to be skipping church.

:)

And, I just donated to Bryan Kennedy.

:hi:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Wow. You just brightened what has so far been a pretty crappy day.
Thanks for donating to Bryan, Bro!! We can relegate ol' F. Jim to the hygiene can with the help of good folks like you. Thank you again, bleev.

:toast:

And yes, I can tape the interview. {grumble, grumble} Mom always said you were the righteous one.

:hi:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. "Wallace promised that the approximately 22-minute interview would air …"
in full and unedited on Sunday. "You'll see the good, the bad, and the ugly," said Wallace. "And there's a little bit of all."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2842700#2842807
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Video_Fox_spins_heated_Clinton_interview_0923.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. I just saw Fred Barnes admitting that Clinton was right
That the Bush Administration did nothing about bin Laden for 8 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Richard Clarke on 60 minutes - March 2004
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5ii7vN59Xo


Clarke's Take On Terror
What Bush's Ex-Adviser Says About Efforts to Stop War On Terror


In the 60 Minutes interview and the book, Clarke tells what happened behind the scenes at the White House before, during and after Sept. 11.
After the president returned to the White House on Sept. 11, he and his top advisers, including Clarke, began holding meetings about how to respond and retaliate. As Clarke writes in his book, he expected the administration to focus its military response on Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. He says he was surprised that the talk quickly turned to Iraq.

"Rumsfeld was saying that we needed to bomb Iraq," Clarke said to Stahl. "And we all said ... no, no. Al-Qaeda is in Afghanistan. We need to bomb Afghanistan. And Rumsfeld said there aren't any good targets in Afghanistan. And there are lots of good targets in Iraq. I said, 'Well, there are lots of good targets in lots of places, but Iraq had nothing to do with it.

"Initially, I thought when he said, 'There aren't enough targets in-- in Afghanistan,' I thought he was joking.

"I think they wanted to believe that there was a connection, but the CIA was sitting there, the FBI was sitting there, I was sitting there saying we've looked at this issue for years. For years we've looked and there's just no connection."


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/19/60minutes/main607356.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. He wasn't perfect, but the Monday Morning Quarterbacking is annoying
Bill may have made some errors and underestimated Osama bin Laden's threat especially when Osama slipped out from Sudan and just barely eluded us in 1998. However, it was difficult to anticipate the threat he imposed, and Bill Clinton undertook a much greater effort than Shrub at any point in his Presidency to take down Osama from the start. IOW, Osama was clearly on Bill's radar screen which he was not for Shrub. Bill even dispatched a group of Pakistani commandos in 2000 to hunt down Osama when he was in our crosshairs-- disrupted only when Musharraf took control unexpectedly (not Musharraf's fault either, just lousy timing).

So yeah, Bill wasn't perfect, but he took Osama far more seriously than GWB ever did-- even after the 9/11 attacks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thank you for posting this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. If more dems handed so called "journalists" their asses
They'd start winning elections.

There no reason whatesoever to show any respect liars and propagandists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vyan Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. They never asked...
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 03:32 PM by Vyan
Neither Chris Wallace or his predecessor Tony Snow have ever asked anyone in the Bush Administration about their response to the Cole bombing.

– Vice President Dick Cheney has been on Fox News Sunday 6 times.

– Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has been on Fox News Sunday 9 times.

– Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been on Fox News Sunday 23 times.

– National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley has been on Fox News Sunday 4 times.

For the record, this was Bill Clinton’s first solo appearance on Fox News Sunday.




Vyan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #24
39. Good info throughout this thread! And thanks for this post, too.
Most interesting to see how many times the war criminals have all had their say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
threadkillaz Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. "I truly am not that concerned about him" - GWB (on Bin Laden), 3-13-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. "No, you intended to move your bones by doing this first."
:rofl:

Thank you for posting this transcript and the additonal info. This one is a keeper.

Recommended, kicked, and bookmarked.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'd pay 20 bucks to get THAT on DVD somewhere!
Please tell me someone YOUTUBED it!

I don't think they'll make the mistake of invite Clinton back again.. :-)

Doug D.
Orlando FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. Somebody should make a docudrama about Tora Bora
I was thinking that the other day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. HOLY SHIT! I wish I could give this 10 votes!

SMACK!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. kick
and R..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
33. WOW!! WOW!! WOW!!
Give 'em hell, Big Dog!!!!!!

:toast: :bounce: :thumbsup: :yourock: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
36. Please rate it up at you tube. Members can post comments as well
Lots of freepers - inclyding the poster "Bill Clinton freaks out" is the title of this there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. The Freepers are over there showing their usual intelligence levels
I had no idea that it could go below zero :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is the best post i have read in a week< knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phrogman Donating Member (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. Here's the promo video of the interview right heah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
42. Thank you Bubba! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
43. Clinton: "You have that little smirk on your face and you think you're so
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 09:11 AM by high density
clever..."

I'm glad he's finally showing some outrage at these wingnuts... All of his silence on the craziness that has been going on was a bit concerning to be honest, so I was glad to see him today on Fox defending himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
44. DAMN!
WALLACE: Would you like to talk about the Clinton Global Initiative?

CLINTON: No I want to finish this.

We have just witnessed a premium-grade ass-kicking.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
45. when's there gonna be
a more complete video? later today perhaps? i've read the transcript but can't wait to see the delivery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
46. Thanks Big Dog.
One of the best things my family's watched together in the past 6 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
47. Chris Wallace got his ass royally kicked and
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 10:59 AM by Pithy Cherub
handed back to him in charred pieces by a President of the United States! Big Dawg came to play and Chris came thinking he was all that and a bag of chip crumbs! That's the way you handle it Dem's full on and head on. Immediately call those media whores on their BS!

President Clinton:woohoo::applause::woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
48. thankyou
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 10:47 AM by barbtries
edited cause put on wrong thread! how do blush in du language?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
49. Post-interview "analysis" by talking heads
Clinton told Wallace to check Richard Clarke's book to get the facts, but post-interview Wallace instead chooses to broadcast a couple off-the-cuff comments by Clarke from TV appearances. No attempt to actually check the facts as detailed in Clarke's book.

What I wouldn't give for some Democrat to finally snap during one of these interviews and just start literally bitch-slapping one of the Right Wingers.

The one bright spot during the post-interview "analysis" was Juan Williams, but his effort at laying out the truth was a drop in the propaganda bucket of swill that was Brit Hume, Chris Wallace and the confused Maura Liasson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vyan Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. You would expect them
to do anything other than spin it as "Clinton Pops His Cork!" from tough questioning by Wallace?

vyan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Already rec'ed, now a kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
53. Chris Wallace looked like a shrunken violet
He wasn't expecting Bill Clinton to defend himself, and it really took him off his script. I just wish the rest of the democrats would light up their fire and straighten a few of these smart alecs out.
I watched it today with my husband and you'd have thought my husband was watching a prize fight.
Thank you Prez Clinton~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:toast: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
54. I've seen the interview and it's not as bad as Drudge and others say it is
Of coarse Clinton was upset and made it clear why he was upset because FOX NEWS doesn't ask the same exact tough questions to the Bush Administration. it was not like Drudge and the media said that he completely went off. and he is right it is a right wing conspiracy to dena grade him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
55. High praise, a request, and a quibble
Vyan--

Your superb LINK-ANNOTATED transcript should remain very useful all the way to Election Day. I hope you will continue to revise it, add more links, and repost it as often as weekly. In your lead-in you might tout your excellent annotations a bit more so people will find them. And you might put your annotations in italics to distinguish them better from the indented transcript text.

You might buttress some of Clinton's statements that currently have no link with an obscure LONG interview Clarke gave to the New Yorker in March '04 ( http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/030804fa_fact ). My snips from that interview and great links from other DUers are at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2227375 .

Here's my quibble, about your linked Richard Clarke December 2000 "Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from the Jihadist Networks of al Qida: Status and Prospects" ( http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/clarke%20attachment.pdf ).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your OP statement that this link is the 1998 "Delenda Plan" appears to be erroneous, according to another of your excellent links. The 1998 Delenda plan apparently is not online:

From page 2 of http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/index.htm :

'The January 25, 2001, memo, recently released to the National Security Archive by the National Security Council, bears a declassification stamp of April 7, 2004, one day prior to Rice's testimony before the 9/11 Commission on April 8, 2004. Responding to claims that she ignored the al-Qaeda threat before September 11, Rice stated in a March 22, 2004 Washington Post op-ed, "No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration."

Two days after Rice's March 22 op-ed, Clarke told the 9/11 Commission, "there's a lot of debate about whether it's a plan or a strategy or a series of options -- but all of the things we recommended back in January were those things on the table in September. They were done. They were done after September 11th. They were all done. I didn't really understand why they couldn't have been done in February."

Also attached to the original Clarke memo are two Clinton-era documents relating to al-Qaeda. The first, "Tab A December 2000 Paper ( http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/clarke%20attachment.pdf ) : Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from the Jihadist Networks of al-Qida: Status and Prospects," was released to the National Security Archive along with the Clarke memo. "TAB B, SEPTEMBER 1998 PAPER: POL-MIL PLAN FOR AL-QIDA," ALSO KNOWN AS THE DELENDA PLAN, WAS ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL MEMO, BUT WAS NOT RELEASED TO THE ARCHIVE AND REMAINS UNDER REQUEST WITH THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC