Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Would Require Tariffs on Chinese Goods if Currency Manipulation Cont

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 04:50 PM
Original message
Bill Would Require Tariffs on Chinese Goods if Currency Manipulation Cont

http://blog.aflcio.org/2006/09/26/bill-would-require-tariffs-on-chinese-goods-if-currency-manipulation-continues/

Bill Would Require Tariffs on Chinese Goods if Currency Manipulation Continues

by James Parks, Sep 26, 2006

The Senate could vote by the end of this week on legislation (S. 295) introduced by Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) that would impose a 27.5 percent tariff on all Chinese imports if that country does not raise the value of its currency.

By deliberately undervaluing its currency, the yuan, the Chinese government exports products at an artificially low price—running up the U.S. trade deficit and costing good American jobs.

An AFL-CIO report shows China’s fixed currency rate artificially lowers the price of its goods by 40 percent and subsidizes exports, putting U.S. companies at a disadvantage. The lack of currency flexibility has been a major factor in U.S. job losses and a trade deficit with China that hit $201 billion last year.

In a Sept. 21 letter to the Senate, AFL-CIO Legislative Director William Samuel writes:

Currency manipulation is an unfair trading practice that helps fuel the deficits. The Chinese government’s manipulation of its currency places U.S. manufacturing at a significant and unfair competitive disadvantage against Chinese products.

By authorizing the 27.5 percent duty that S. 295 would place on Chinese imports into the U.S., our government will be sending a strong signal that China must end its illegal trade practice and revalue its currency.

The AFL-CIO also is backing a similar House bill (H.R. 1498) sponsored by Reps. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) and Tim Ryan (D-Ohio).

In 2005, the U.S. trade deficit with China reached a staggering $201 billion, a record that will be shattered in 2006. In addition, the 2005 U.S. current account deficit—the measure of foreign trade that covers not only goods and services but also investment flows between countries—rose to a record $791.5 billion. It is on a course to reach $900 billion this year.

A new policy memo by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) shows China’s currency manipulation has enabled it to dramatically increase its exports to the United States in the past nine years and has reduced the market share of U.S. manufacturers who either laid off workers, closed down or moved offshore.

FULL story at link above.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. poking our own eyes out
Ok, let me understand - we want to raise prices on an enormous array of goods from China to spite the fact that China has been subsidizing those imports by keeping the yuan low.

I can't think of a single reason for this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. From the article
"By deliberately undervaluing its currency, the yuan, the Chinese government exports products at an artificially low price—running up the U.S. trade deficit and costing good American jobs"

The trade deficit is not that big of a deal. The way we calculate the balance does not include "services" only goods. So the billions of dollars Microsoft get from it's "services" over seas are not factored into the trade deficit numbers.

By artificially undervaluing the yuan, the Chinese are able to keep the global markets playing field to their advantage as to support their economic growth. Without the cheap yuan, they become more uncompetitive in the world markets.

Bottom line is: This bill will never see the light of day, but it does send a message to the Chinese, stop jerking us around, you need us a lot more than we need you. We have the ability to turn our economy on a dime to produce what we want, the Chinese don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC