Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What an interesting time in politics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Singular73 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:29 PM
Original message
What an interesting time in politics
Democrats, who have seemed impotent and vulnerable over the last, oh, I don't know, 6 years or so, have finally discovered some missing political acuman, in the form of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

I personally thought the dems would attempt to cruise into November without a message, scurrying to and fro with every Republican accusation, but for the time being -- and a very important time it is -- they are controlling the message.

I laughed out loud during the FOX interview with Clinton. He knew exactly what he was doing. I'm sure he had rehearsed it in front of the mirror.

And the media, including FOX, is gullible enough to discuss the "side effect" of reigniting (or primarily igniting) the "Who is responsible for 9/11" debate.

Who can you trust on terror?

Couple that with this newly released report, and you HAVE TO UNDERSTAND that this entire thing was orchestrated weeks ago. Pieces don't just fall into place this organically, within a 3-day period.

Rove is attempting to hit back by releasing parts of this report, which really doesn't help them if you actually READ it, but it gives them the talking point of "We declassified it to show the truth", not mentioning that the actual Truth doesn't help them.

Very desperate move, but a necessary one. Had they not released this report, we'd be talking about it for another 6 weeks. Maybe this way, we'll only be talking about it for 3.

The funniest thing I've heard in a LONG time is this George Allen "Deer Hunter" story.

I mean, for gods sakes. You can't make this stuff up.

Oh my, what a wonderful week in politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, you think Clinton held his tongue the past 5yrs as part of an act?
I don't think he'd do that - not to the party - not to this country.

I think he was sick of being blamed for 9-11 and could no longer hold back out of deference to the Bushes as he had been for the past 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Singular73 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You bet your ass.
Hillary wasn't running in 04.

Clinton probably believes that he can *prime* Congress with picking up a few seats in the house and senate, and betting that we can take the entire kit and kaboodle in 08, with his wife at the helm.

I mean, come on. Watch him during the interview. He was rallying the base....look at what hillary was saying today.

These guys live and breathe politics. And Clinton is the master at it. He wouldn't lose his shit, except on purpose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Clinton is calculating but he doesn't hate this country to the point he'd
purposely remain quiet and NOT hit back when the RW was spreading the meme that "Dems are weak on terror because Clinton did nothing" for five years.

Clinton's silence burdened every Democratic candidate running in 2002 and 2004, and you want to believe he did that on PURPOSE?

I criticize Clinton for being late to the game here, but, I think it was just a misguided attempt at statesmanship, not a calculation meant to hurt the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow - I thought you'd get alot of agreement on your post.
Usually anything I disagree with, most here do agree. heheh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC