nyt has stated that they have kept

[kentjay]

some of condi`s secrets secret.how can a newspaper consider itself an informing to the public if it keeps secrets from the public?some things the times knows could very well sway the election or at least stop the completion of the nazis takeover.anything that a newspaper knows and withholds is in cink with the govt.so when the govt. officials are prosecuted for war crimes,please include the journalists.6 more troops killed yesterday,yet the war has found the back pages of most newspaper.

[ShortnFiery]

1. Shit, first the WP and now the NYT ... we have no Fourth Estate. :( n/t

[zbdent]

2. It must have been forgotten by the MSM that the NY Times held back

reporting the illegal actions of the Bush misAdministration more than a year, until well after the 2004 elections ... that damn "liberal media" ...

[Donald Ian Rankin]

3. Good for them

Newspapers shouldn't be distributing the details of politicians' private lives unless there's a particularly clear reason why it's in the public interest. I can envisage all sorts of things I'd heartily support them keeping secret about her.

[plcdude]

4. do you have

a site for this posting?