Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question for the congniscenti re: 'The Military Vote'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:41 PM
Original message
A question for the congniscenti re: 'The Military Vote'
I can't claim any connection to today's average military person or their families. Back when I was in (Moby Dick was a minnow back then and all the news was about Viet Nam) there were at least as many of my fellow sailors who were against the war as for it; probably with a tilt to 'against'. In fact, our supply officer, for whom I worked and who was an Annapolis grad, was quite opposed. I know, however, that's no indication of anything besides my own personal experience.

During the Reign of St. Ronnie, there seemed to be a shift to a stronger RepublicIck leaning, mainly because he spent so much for new toys and appeared to be a supporter of the military. This continued under Bush The Slightly Smarter But No More In Touch, and then take a turn back to neutral under Clinton, but with more overtly vocal opposition from the right side of the spectrum.

Does anyone have any feel about what the political lean of the military and their families is today? I can imagine it would be a lot like what I experienced way back in the day .... what with an unpopular war and stupid decisions by the civilian leadership.

But I don't know.

How do you see it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. delete please
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 12:51 PM by BOSSHOG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually, that was valuable .....
.... the speechifying rhetoric using the terms of the civilian leadership is what the military professionals are *supposed* to do.

The fact that no one was saying anything else is telling. Neutral is good. It says to me they look a lot like the rest of the country ...... pretty evenly divided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was up at NPC two weeks ago
at the CPO pinning ceremony. No surprise, but the patriotism was palpable. I heard "global war on terror" in a couple of speechs and I observed a whole bunch of professionals wanting to do their jobs. But in my unscientific survey I could not detect any politics, neither pro or anti bush. I guess I did just a great job of answering your question huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. My reply to you is under your now self deleted thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. From my experience
My husband is in the army and went to Iraq back in 2003, a few months after it started. Back then, when they first went, it was fairly evenly split for and against the war (at least in terms of the people he knew). The Bush backers were largely for the war, of course. By the time they came back, even the majority of republicans were against the war and at the 2004 election chose to either vote for Kerry or not vote at all.

He is now with a different unit and no one likes Bush. His commander hates Bush. His soldiers hate Bush. The majority of people he knows hate Bush and the others just don't say much either way. I couldn't tell you how they are split in terms of Republicans and Democrats, but in our experience, they are against Bush. They complain that the army is in shambles all because of Rumsfeld and Bush.

As far as military families -- I hate to say this, but the wives seem to be a little dumber and are somewhat more supportive of the war and Bush.

But that's our experience, I'd like to hear what other troops/their families have experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wow!
If your experience is at all indicative of the larger military community, guys like Allen should see some real blowback .... blowback that will favor a guy like Webb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Several Of My Wife & My Friends Are Up For Re-Deployment
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:02 PM by The Deacon
(For one it will be his second, for another his third stint) and they seem somewhat less than thrilled with Junior. Of course, they both also love Bill Clinton & practically worship Jimmy Carter (the wives do, that is), so its hard to say if the War has anything to do with it. Third couple were anti-Gore and are very tight-lipped at the moment - haven't heard them make any political statements (and don't know who they voted for in 2004 - just that they SAY they were anti-Gore in 2000.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Active at Ft. Knox in the 70s, work nearby now---

The antiwar sentiment is here again but not as strong. The multiple deployments and PTSD stuff is rough as hell on families. I also hear what
a previous poster does--deafening silence now from those who were pro Bush and pro-engagement in '04. I hear no respect for Bush; only dedication to duty. Some vets around here are more vocal about the overworked/underequipped/stretched thin status that they know a lot about.

Upshot; the tide hasn't turned yet but the rah rah days are gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC