Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: Senate passes Terror detainee legislation 65-34!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:16 PM
Original message
MSNBC: Senate passes Terror detainee legislation 65-34!
:wtf:?

I want the names of the SOB's who backed this damn thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. These So-Called Dems are on the GOP Side
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 06:28 PM by stepnw1f
All treasonous cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. No the 34 voted no
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 06:22 PM by WildEyedLiberal
There were 12 Dem traitors who voted yes:

Carper, Johnson, Landrieu, Lautenberg(???!!!!), Lieberman, Menendez, Nelson (Fla.), Nelson (Neb.), Pryor, Rockefeller, Salazar and Stabenow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. BASTARDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Jesus.... I'm Sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. ROCKEFEELLER? STABENOW?
I am absolutely incensed, especially about Jay R. Thought he was a good guy but ...

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Nelson of Florida? FUCK HIM TO HELL. I wont vote for him, my wife and kids
will not, thats 4 votes he is NOT GETTING.

WE WILL NOT VOTE FOR TORTURERS OR ENABLERS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. And how will we benefit by helping to put a Rethug in office who
voted exactly the same way on this bill? But worse on a myriad of other bills?

I don't follow your reasoning. The time to get on his case is after the general election, after we have majorities in the House and/or Senate. Not before.

If Ted Kennedy had been head of Judiciary, do you think this bill would have ever made it out of committee? No way!

Hold your nose, vote for Nelson, and tell yourself that you're really voting for Ted Kennedy, Patrick Leahy, and the other Dem Senators who will head major committees if incumbants like Nelson keep their jobs and we win a handful of other seats.

Then we can get to work on investigating the hell out of the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. There is no difference between a Democratic torturer and a Republican
Keep in mind that you may be the one that gets tortured under this law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
61. Patrick Leahy would be chair of the Judiciary Committee,,, eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. make that 5 more here in FL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. Lautenberg? What the hell?!
I thought he was on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
63. You mean 11 and one "Connecticut For Leiberman Party" one. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveFighter Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
67. Congratulations Democrats for voting for torture
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 11:39 AM by ProgressiveFighter
Love you Landrieu, you're so amazing
</snark>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. The names:
~snip~

Final passage of the torture/detention bill was 65-34.
~snip~

Twelve Democrats voted in favor, 1 Republican and 1 independent voted against (there may be one or two errors because I compiled the list while listening to the vote):

Democrats in favor (12) - Carper (Del.), Johnson (S.D.), Landrieu (La.), Lautenberg (N.J.), Lieberman (Conn.), Menendez (N.J), Nelson (Fla.), Nelson (Neb.), Pryor (Ark.), Rockefeller (W. Va.), Salazar (Co.), Stabenow (Mich.).

Republicans against (1) - Chafee (R.I.).

Jeffords (I) voted against.


http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/09/george-bushs-vast-new-powers-of.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. LIEBERMAN VOTED For
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 06:58 PM by stepnw1f
No surprises in that list.... each one has been consistantly voting in favor of Bush and the Right Wing agenda. I shouted out Loserman's name on purpose.... Lamont should use it against him in the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
64. my head is hanging low in shame
shame shame shame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Landreiu and Lieberman voted aye
they don't count.

They were the only shitbags on the dem side that i heard.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yet another reason for me to vote for Lamont!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. I can't write any more LTTE's for a while. Can you?
I truly believe the voters don't know exactly what happened today, but enough of them would care, if they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. DING! DING! DING!
You are correct.

VOTE FOR NED! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. There were 12 shitbags
See my post above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobMorr Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. replied instead of pm
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 06:33 PM by BobMorr
mistake in replying-sorry about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Friendly hint:
You should probably PM KyndCulture with your name and addy... this is a public board and lots of nasty people troll and lurk here... I was here for just a month when a freeper went to my profile, found my link to my homepage, found out my email address, and sent me a threatening email. Just a friendly warning - these fuckers are desperate and I'd hate to see you get harassed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Well Lieberman's no surpirse.
The man will no longer be welcomed into the Democratic Party even if he does win over Lamont in November. He burned his bridges a long time ago.


John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
55. the nelsons are no surprise either. neither is the queen of katrina
stabenow? what the hell is her problem???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thomas doesn't have the roll call vote up yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
47. Roll call is here
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00259

Snowe didn't vote. She's had a death in her family. The woman who raised her just passed away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #47
62. Specter - Yea????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can think of one Florida Senator who is NOT getting my vote
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Katherine Harris would be a better choice? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I believe this falls under
douche v. turd sandwich

But seriously,so what if its R or D in that seat if they all vote the same way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Makes a difference who has the majority
Who can call hearings, set agenda, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I have no intention of voting for her
She is batsh*t crazy, but dammit...what motivation do I have to vote for Nelson at this point? As far as I am concerned his only campaign slogan is "I am less insane than Harris". That is not enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Because if Nelson keeps his seat, and we get a handful more,
then we'll have people like Ted Kennedy and Patrick Leahy in charge of Senate committees and a bill like this would never make it out of committee. Get it? We'll have people issuing subpoenas and investigating and exercising oversight vis a vis the Executive branch -- the way Congress has always functioned throughout history -- until now.

It's critical that we not lose ANY seats now -- instead, we have to pick up a few. So hold your nose and vote for the guy -- and imagine you're voting for Ted Kennedy instead. Because that's what you'll really be doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Thanks
I needed that advice. After so many votes like this....:banghead:

I have every intention of holding my nose, taking my Dramamine, and pushing the little button for Nelson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. Tell him you won't vote for him. Vote for him with nose pinched,
Most importantly, write him a letter informing him that you will work to see that he is prosecuted for his ILLEGAL, anti-constitutional approval of this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #33
57. Thank you, jellybeancurse.
Believe me, I know how you feel. The changes that Bush has brought are mind boggling -- almost inconceivable. I have two teenage sons and I am terrified about the road Bush is leading us down.

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. Can't do that!
He's just another Lieberman,I want a Dem who fights for his party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Trust me I understand!
I'm seriously conflicted. Do I vote for him in the hopes that Democrats regain control (but let me be clear that I think it will have a VERY small impact on the overall attitude and ideology of essentially corporate sponsored "representatives") or do I not vote for either candidate b/c I consider them both equally morally bankrupt and worthy of my contempt?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. And if one person is tortured due to the passage of this bill...
Nelson gets to do HARD time, right? He deserves nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Voting for this bill
is the equivalent of doing the torture yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. R v. D
As disgusted as I am by Sen. Nelson - AGAIN - there is no way I could vote for Harris.

I am a bit confused by his vote on this, though. He voted aye for the amendments, then when push came to shove, voted for the final bill.

.Sigh. Politics? Doesn't want to appear "Soft on Terra?"
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/n000032/votes/

Reminds me of the IRW, and the calls coming into his office were something like a gazillion to one against - and he voted for it. Remember at the time reading that the reason was something along the lines of he had to consider those who hadn't called, too. (I really went WTF!? on that one.)



soup <--- Feeling very lost lately, but not about to vote for Harris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybeancurse Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Push comes to shove....
I'll vote for him over Harris. I know I will, but it makes me sick I have to choose between Bill "I condone torture" Nelson and Katherine "look at my boobs" Harris.

How can you be opposed to torture and then vote that way? I mean there is a serious democratic deficit in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I'm feeling lost and disgusted and discouraged
but none of that's going to keep me from voting for every Dem on the ballot. The Republicans have had a lock on power for too long. We have to break it. And sitting out the election or voting for a 3rd party won't help a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
60. I know you've heard this before
and I completely understand your anger, but there is a difference. Did you hear Senator Leahy yesterday? If we take the majority he replaces that traitor Arlen. Did you hear Kennedy yesterday? If we take the majority, he chairs, Health and education. If there's any way you can see to do it, vote dem for those reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
40. no, just won't vote!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
56. yeah, sure she'd be a better choice. another boob job and maybe
a few nose jobs--she'd spend her six years in the recovery room (figuring out more evil ways to steal votes again)


on second thought--i don't think katherine is the best man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Uh-huh.....
12 Democrats who voted yes:

Carper, Johnson, Landrieu, Lautenberg, Lieberman, Menendez, Nelson (Fla.), Nelson (Neb.), Pryor, Rockefeller, Salazar and Stabenow


Almost every one of them (WTF... Lautenberg?) is DLC.

Ugh. Disgusting! ---- Every single one of these colluders is D I S G U S T I N G and a criminal.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Lautenberg and Menendez floored me
WHY???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Good Lord, and I was so sure they would vote the right way.
I e-mailed but did not call. That's what I get for trusting that the people I voted for will do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. I don't get Lautenberg at all -
You could easily sell a no vote in NJ - I don't think either of these is DLC - they're both liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. This vote transcends party lines
(including bringing up DLC)

This vote goes to the basic core of morality and human decency.

And it must be unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. You can flame away, but stabenow does not get my vote.
I'm no one issue voter, but I can't vote for someone who supports or condones torture, period. There is no excuse for this, Hell! she's not even in a close race. No, I won't vote for the repub, and I know he would have voted for this bill as well, but when you go into the voting booth you are registering your support of your choice's agenda. I cannot register that support and it sickens me that I ever did so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. so you don't think you're facilitating the election of a repub
when you don't vote the Democratic opponent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. I won't vote for a proponent of torture.
It's really that simple. There's not even a point in arguing it because it won't happen. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. In this case, you could be registering your support for the Party's
position -- which was overwhelmingly against the bill -- rather than for that candidate's position on that particular bill.

If you don't vote for Stabenow, you're not doing everything you could do to fight this administration. Sitting out that race doesn't fight the Administration.

If we had someone like Ted Kennedy in charge of Judiciary, this bill would never have gotten out of Committee. That's why we need a majority in Congress. If we control the committees, and exercise subpoena power, we will be able to accomplish a lot -- as opposed to now, when our hands are completely tied.

Vote for Stabenow so we don't lose a current Dem seat -- which is critical if we're to end up with a majority. A majority is what we need in order to be able to fight Bush effectively. Do you really want another two years of powerlessness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. As I said just above, this isn't a point of debate.
You live your life according to your conscience and I'll live according to mine. Mine says don't vote for torturers. It's very clear that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
59. Sometime ago I might have tried to convince you otherwise
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 01:52 AM by fujiyama
Being in MI as well, this is going to be a real nose-pincher. Between this and the bankruptcy bill vote, it won't be easy voting for her...Hell, I'll just have to think of it as voting AGAINST the republican Bouchard.

But I can't blame you for not finding it possible to vote for someone that voted for such garbage like this. This country has stepped into extremely dangerous territory...It's often difficult to remember which country we live in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timbuk3 Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
35. K&R
Thanks for the link from LBN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. it just gets worse and f$#@!ing worse
I can't believe my country is doing this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Situation
Now Bush can have anyone arrested,tortured by the Cia,and tried In Military Tribunals Including American citizens.Not much different than Saddam Is he.A shame we don't have 44 real democrats.
Only 32 are really Democrats.The rest are Democrats In Name only.At times Jeffords votes more like a
Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mroux Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
53. how much worse does it have to get
before Americans will take back the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. My letter to stabenow.
Senator Stabenow,

I have been a solid Democratic voter for 20 years and have been proud to vote for some of the finest politicians this country has to offer. I also voted for you in the 2000 election. I am writing today to tell you that I will not be making that mistake again.

I can understand voting for a more centrist policy, but you have now voted in favor of torturing people. I won't bother detailing the other provisions of this bill curtailing a detainee's right to even try to prove his/her innocence through writ of habeus corpus; it is enough to know that you support cruel and inhuman interrogation techniques on those unfortunate enough to have been born in another country or who happen to have darker skin than yourself.

There are many, many, more people like myself who find themselves not only appalled but literally disgusted by your vote. We will not make the mistake of spending our own vote so foolishly, or so callously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StaggerLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #54
65. great letter
I'm going to draft one up to her as well.

I'm so pissed right now.

:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
58. MY GOD! VOTING FOR TORTURE!
I'm sick at heart. Is this the death of the Constitution? It may well be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
66. voiceoutrage.com
Don't keep the outrage to yourself!!

http://voiceoutrage.com">voiceoutrage.com


Call this abomination what it is: The War Criminals Protection Act

(And maybe give http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2255629&mesg_id=2255629">this one a kick)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC