Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To keep seat, Republicans will have to vote for a pedophile in Nov

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:22 PM
Original message
To keep seat, Republicans will have to vote for a pedophile in Nov
Foley's name has to stay on the ballot, while votes cast for him will be counted toward his party's new choice.


http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001642.php
snip>
Here's the relevant statute:

.....If the name of the new nominee is submitted after the certification of results of the preceding primary election, however, the ballots shall not be changed and the former party nominee's name will appear on the ballot. Any ballots cast for the former party nominee will be counted for the person designated by the political party to replace the former party nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure it won't bother them
morals are only for other people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You said it...
They'd vote for Hitler if it helped them maintain a majority... Oops, I guess they already did. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. no, Hitler served in the military and brought jobs to the country...
instead of shipping them out.

At least Bush's death camps have had fewer victims.....so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. So what else is new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. To be fair, we don't know he's a pedophile, yet
Pedophiles target pre-pubescent kids. So far it's only been verified that he targeted teenagers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It still gives a special savor to the phrase "Republican Chickenhawk"
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. True.
Perhaps "letcherous lothario" would have been more accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. And they will ...
vote for him he's got an R in front of his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a reasonably Republican district with a couple swing and Democratic
counties thrown in. It's possible to win it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. In 2004, Republican Mark Foley won by over 2 to 1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._House_election,_2004

Mark Foley (R) 68%
Jeffrey Jay Fisher (D) 32%


Democrats can't assume we'll win this seat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. There is a popular incumbant factor in that.
The number is tighter in an open race. Also Foley did better than Bush in the district from what I read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmacat Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. LOL. Most of the Repubs probably only watch FOX so, by the time November
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 05:53 PM by enigmacat
comes, FOX will have spun it as the teen's fault.

FOX=:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Foley isn't a pedophile
A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children. A 16 year old is an adolescent. Now, a 16 year old in most parts is still under the legal age to have sex so he'd still be in a heap of trouble but not as much as if he were propositioning kindergarteners.

Oh, by the way, he's also an idiot. Good riddance, I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC