|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 05:41 AM Original message |
Republicans block investigation into Foley scandal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. Foley should be up on criminal charges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thepurpose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 05:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Demos need to ask how this is ethics issue. This criminal sexual conduct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 06:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJCher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
3. Foley ought to be tackled and thrown on the ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 06:11 AM Response to Original message |
5. So the rethugs are even going to protect a PEDOPHILE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
6. Move along. There is nothing to see here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
7. call the cops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
8. It says "unanimously." Did Pelosi vote against herself? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 09:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. From the article, I'm not sure what she wanted and what happened... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
9. well, they may not be able to block a criminal investigation.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-30-06 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
10. Why didn't Boehner refer this to the Ethics Committee last spring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC