Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans block investigation into Foley scandal.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 05:41 AM
Original message
Republicans block investigation into Foley scandal.
"House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) took the House floor last night to demand an investigation into the Foley matter. But Boehner headed her off, calling on the House to refer the matter to the ethics committee, which the House promptly voted unanimously to do.

The news of Foley's resignation overshadowed an afternoon Republican ceremony hailing a military commissions bill, and it gave Democrats sudden hopes of winning the Palm Beach-based 16th District. Many lawmakers think Democrats are on the verge of winning control of the House in November, and an unexpected gain could prove crucial.

At the Capitol Hill signing ceremony for the commissions bill, a GOP campaign priority, reporters asked Hastert only about Foley. "He's done the right thing," Hastert replied. "I've asked John Shimkus , who is head of the Page Board, to look into this issue regarding Congressman Foley. We want to make sure that all of our pages are safe and our page system is safe. None of us are happy about it."

ABC News reported yesterday that it had interviewed Foley, 52, about excerpts of instant messages provided by current and former pages under the age of 18. ABC reported that Foley, under the AOL Instant Messenger screen name Maf54, made repeated references to sexual acts and body parts. Foley's spokesman did not respond to a Washington Post request for comment on the ABC report."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/29/AR2006092901574.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Foley should be up on criminal charges.
Diddling minors is still illegal, unless of course you are torturing them. Maybe the bushes authorized this as torture. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thepurpose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Demos need to ask how this is ethics issue. This criminal sexual conduct
Please demos beat this horse to death. Day and night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Absolutely.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Foley ought to be tackled and thrown on the ground
Like they do in Dateline's "To Catch a Predator." Then he should be taken to a trailer and interviewed by the local cop, who will want to know details. Then a search of what he has in his car. A pack of Trojans? Booze? Pot? Hey, maybe a penis pump or a prescription for Viagra.

The entire interview should be broadcast to millions on nationwide TV. Foley's mug should be shown to all as that of a sexual predator.

His computers will be seized indefinitely. Kiddie porn on them; other evidence, too.

That's what should happen but what will happen is hearings will be held in secret. Mr. Foley will soon be confessing to a prescription pain addiction or booze (if he hasn't already) and he will blame it on that. He will enter "treatment." Little more will be heard about it.




Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. So the rethugs are even going to protect a PEDOPHILE
OMG!!! do they have any decency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Move along. There is nothing to see here.
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 06:42 AM by SpiralHawk
Move along. It's just another republicon pervert.

So shut up and sit down, and remember that Big BushCo loves you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. call the cops


Greedy Overbloated Pederasts (GOP)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. It says "unanimously." Did Pelosi vote against herself? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. From the article, I'm not sure what she wanted and what happened...
...were any different. I'll admit I don't know much about House procedure, but I'm not sure if Pelosi may have just made a speech rather than calling for a vote, and then Boehner called for a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. well, they may not be able to block a criminal investigation....
So, somehow I think the truth will come out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why didn't Boehner refer this to the Ethics Committee last spring
when he found out about it?

Can you say

COVERUP?


I thought you could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC