Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Perceptions of Republican Fearmongers and the Simple Truth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 04:06 PM
Original message
Perceptions of Republican Fearmongers and the Simple Truth
September 30, 2006


Fears and lies intensify consciousness. -- Cooley


Bush isn't really looking to win what he calls his 'war on terror' at this point, so much as he wants to be 'perceived' as winning. He's terrified that he'll be revealed to the world as a pathetic loser who's squandered everything that was given him (again) and destroyed everything he's touched. Bush can't decide which excuse for his failures he should choose from the slim thread of lies he has left, so he's just throwing them all together to see if any will give him cover from the heightening scrutiny on his poor and negligent conduct in Iraq and Afghanistan, and on his failed 'hunt' for bin-Laden and his accomplices.

Bush opened his defense of his presidency Saturday in his radio address quoting the National Intelligence Estimate, which has concluded that his occupation of Iraq is spawning and fueling 'jihadists' bent on harming the U.S., our interests, and allies. He told Americans when the April report was revealed to the public that they didn't have the entire picture; that the news accounts of the NIE left out key passages in his defense. He said in his address that the leak of the Iraq report had created "misimpressions." Bush wanted to clear things up.

The NIE, he said, listed "four underlying factors that are fueling the extremist movement: first, long-standing grievances such as corruption, injustice, and a fear of Western domination; second, the jihad in Iraq; third, the slow pace of reform in Muslim nations; and fourth, pervasive anti-Americanism. It concludes that terrorists are exploiting all these factors to further their movement," he said.

So much of what Bush related in those 'underlying factors' concluded by the NIE has long been under the charter and responsibility of our nation's State Dept.. All of these have traditionally been addressed in partnership with the international community; most effectively, with those nations which border the areas of conflict. The partnerships which were formed after 9-11 promised to usher in a new era of cooperation between nations against the forces which were aligned against America. Those partnerships were strained, and in many instances, dissolved, as Bush pulled away from the pursuit of the perpetrators of the attacks on our nation to unilaterally, preemptively invade and occupy Iraq.

As the very intelligence report he chose to own-up to concludes, Bush's militarism has not proven effective in halting the spread of the threat, nor has his blundering approach been successful in even stifling the actions and influence of those individuals that they themselves identify as the original orchestrators of the 9-11 attacks. The most damning conclusion of the report is that Iraq has been more than a diversion from addressing the 'underlying factors' identified in the report. The invasion and occupation has actually aggravated and deepened the animosity among the citizens of those Muslim nations who have watched the U.S. committing repeated acts of collateral and deliberate atrocities with their bombings; with their search and destroy missions; with the reflexively defensive casualties committed by our soldiers at the myriad of checkpoints; and with the mass detentions which have harbored more torture of innocents than Saddam could imagine; all of that representing our continuing self-appointed control over the citizens there.

Bush turned to the words of his co-hort, Tony Blair with the British Prime Minister's argument that, "This terrorism isn't our fault. We didn't cause it. It's not the consequence of foreign policy." Yet, it was Blair who long ago admitted that their assault on Baghdad was essentially a muscle-flexing exercise. They thought Iraq would be a cakewalk (the hunt for bin Laden was a bust) so they loaded up our national pride and covered all of us with Iraqi blood to go with the blood of innocent Afghans caught in our swaggering reprisal. Tens of thousands of innocents, in Iraq and Afghanistan have been killed by our cluster bombs, our search and destroy missions, and by the misguided hands of our nervous soldiers so that Blair and Bush could "draw a line in the sand" like bullies in front of a crowd.

'Bring them on,' was Bush's challenge to any and all who would resist his bloody overthrow and theft of their land and resources. To Bush and the republican enablers in Congress, expressions of liberty and self-determination are merely threats to their consolidation of assumed power. All of this done with the awesome and vital force of our nation's defenses. But, five years after the attacks of 9-11, Bush and his republican co-horts have failed to learn the limits of that force in suppressing those 'ideologies' they fear, and have failed to recognize the danger of their own arrogant slaughter and detention of innocents caught in the way of their greed and hunger for power.

Thursday, Bush taunted Democrats as a party which has forgotten the lessons of FDR and Truman. It's doubtful that Bush ever read any of the words of those outstanding Democrats. But, lest we allow him to continue to mislead, I would offer one quote from FDR which would instruct Bush and his republican party of fear: In his fourth inaugural address, Roosevelt remarked that, "We have learned the simple truth, as Emerson said, that the only way to have a friend is to be one. We can gain no lasting peace if we approach it with suspicion or mistrust or with fear."

Even simple truths, however, seem to escape Bush's view as he readily sacrifices trillions of dollars and thousands of lives in his vain attempt to dominate these Muslim nations to be perceived as a victor and to deny his phantom 'terrorists' their own perceived victory. But the orchestrators of 9-11 have already made gains off of his blunders, back-steps and abuses.

"The National Intelligence Estimate," Bush argued in his address, "declares 'perceived jihadist success there would inspire more fighters to continue the struggle elsewhere.' It also says that 'Should jihadists leaving Iraq perceive themselves, and be perceived, to have failed, we judge fewer fighters will be inspired to carry on the fight.' Is this Bush's perception as well? Does he want us to accept the words of these thugs as some undisputed gospel?

The simple truths of Bush's failures, as revealed in that nagging intelligence estimate, are already known and understood by the Muslim world, as the limits of his ability to kill 'terrorists' by unleashing waves of shock and awe are revealed in the greater numbers who are influenced by the killings into joining in active, violent resistance. Bush and his republicans are not learning a thing because it's not their lives and livelihoods they're putting on the line. Our soldiers are at the point of their political campaign, and they keep extending their role in Iraq, despite the report, despite the 2700-plus American soldier's lives lost there.

"Withdrawing before the enemy is defeated would embolden the terrorists," Bush argued. "It would help them find new recruits to carry out even more destructive attacks on our Nation." The irony of that statement is more than evident to anyone who can read the estimate.

He has all of the elements of the simple truth in front of him, but he's intent on trying to cover them up with lies from his slim thread. We are a nation which used to keep our commitment to our troops that they would only be used in necessary defense of our country, upholding the rule of law and keeping us secure by adhering closely to the principles of our democracy.

In every instance since 9-11, Bush and his republicans have attacked those very principles as mere affronts to their own imperial reign which they insist must be maintained to keep us from harm. Their own intelligence estimate shows that their remedy, the military muckraking that they have yoked us to, is the most present and pernicious danger our country faces. We must encourage voters to face that danger without fear in November, and remove these arrogant pretenders from their majority control which they have used to initiate and perpetuate their epic failures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mr President are you saying the still classified portions of the report
would clear everything up? Or would they reveal that it's exactly how it appears to be? Well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. he only brought up the two references:
the one listing the 'underlying causes' and the other worrying about the 'perceptions' of 'jihadists'.

pretty much a canard to claim the initial reports didn't represent the entirety of the report. I imagine, like you, that the parts he's not telling us about are worse. Rep. Harman, who's seen the report says the conclusions represent the entirety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. if things are going so great
i doubt they would be kept a secret.

Bush is pathetically blubbering again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He has nothing left to hide behind
the solution to his idiocy is a simple as stepping up and holding him accountable now. That's what we have to do. Mobilize the vote. It's in our hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kicking this.
And recommending it also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks so much for the k&r calimary!
cheers:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. final (edited) version and link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Critics bash Bush for rerun-style radio address
Sun, Oct. 01, 2006

The president’s “empty slogans” do nothing to achieve success in Iraq, the Democrats argue.

WASHINGTON | Gloves-off election-year rhetoric hit the radio Saturday, as President Bush argued that critics are wrongheaded to argue for a different policy in Iraq.

Democrats suggested that Bush was more interested in politically helpful slogans than success in the war.

With just over five weeks to go before midterm elections in which GOP control of Congress could be at risk, Democrats have been citing a government intelligence assessment to bolster their criticism of Bush’s approach to Iraq. The classified National Intelligence Estimate, parts of which Bush declassified last week, says the Iraq war had contributed to a global growth in the terrorist movement, but it also said success there could drain jihadists of momentum.

The president has been fighting back with a series of appearances, and he recycled many lines from earlier in the week in his Saturday radio address.

“Five years after the 9/11 attacks, some people in Washington still do not understand the nature of the enemy. The only way to protect our citizens at home is to go on the offense against the enemy across the world,” Bush said.

Democrats chose Tammy Duckworth, a former Army helicopter pilot who lost both legs in Iraq and now is running for the U.S. House in Illinois, to respond. “Anyone who challenges our failed policies, or suggests the need for a new strategy, is accused of ‘cutting and running,’ ” Duckworth said. “Well, I didn’t cut and run, Mr. President. Like so many others, I proudly fought and sacrificed. … And I believe the brave men and women who are serving in Iraq today, their families and the American people deserve more than the same empty slogans and political name-calling.”

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/15650272.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. kicking for some hits before the article sunsets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC