Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CSPAN- Dean may suffer from being pessimistic and angry in the GE.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:39 AM
Original message
CSPAN- Dean may suffer from being pessimistic and angry in the GE.
People generally would rather vote for someone upbeat, optimistic, and forward thinking as opposed to someone angry and pessimistic.

On cspan right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. who is saying this? a caller on the republican line?
just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:42 AM
Original message
I'm the furthest thing from a republican....
And I don't think that's an entirely inaccurate statement. I'm not saying it will cost us the election but I generally think that the statement that was made is true. People I think would rather an optimistic, positive thinking candidate who they disagree with on a few issues, than a dour, negative, angry one who they may agree with more. Notice they included the caveat that it would cost him in the general election not the primary. The general election obviously has more independent and swing voters who time and time again shows don't like negativity or angry people.

I don't like that this may be true, but I don't think that it's only republicans who feel that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. FDR's camapaign song in '32: Happy Days are Hear Again.
Hoover was worse than Bush, and Bush is trying to revive the exact same pro-Wall St fascism that his grandfather and other Republicans were trying to foist on America that FDR fought back with hope and optimism in the 30s.

FDR is the blue print for victory in 2004. Dean is no FDR.

Edwards, at the Commonwealth Club said that FDR didn't win by telling Americans that the economic situation was their fault becuase they didn't get in Hoover's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-03 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. i agree...we need our own version of 'Morning in America" message
and nothing i have seen, yet, let's me think dean can pull that off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. An op-ed piece...I can't remember the name...
Still listening, I'll update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. it's from the NYT here's the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Anna Migori (sp?)and Richard Stevens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Says who?
Is this more Friday AM flamebait?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Script: :"Dean is Angry/Snippy"
So why do my eyes and ears almost always show something different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. I think I was the first person on DU to say that Dean was angry and it was
after listening to one of his stump speeches, and it was based on his language and imagery. The speech was filled with battle imagery and metaphors for fighting.

If anyone cares to prove that this is the case, just look at and listen to some of his speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not interested in Dean's purge of the Democratic Party...
... by someone from the "Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party". I'm very concerned that his campaign is based upon exclusion, not inclusion. That is the great mistake of Democrats past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. let's clarify this
the things that fire-up Dean are the very reasons for hope and optimism in this country.

Poor lil' Democrats, why, they have forgotten their place in lining up behind the idiot son. We tried to tell them it was the unpatriotic thing to do, the unAmerican way, and look they are still angry...don't worry, be happy, and elbow for photo ops with the smirking chimp. The voters will love it. obviously not, no matter how the media mouthpiece promotes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AWD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly....
...I mean, why would we vote for a guy who VOTES to startthe war or a guy who CHEERED for the war on CNN when we can just KEEP the guy in the White House who got us into it all to begin with.

The record is clear. Kerry supported the war and Clark cheered it on. Time to clean out the primaries and let someone run who actually stands AGAINST Bush and his war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Iraq war is ancient history.
And Dean had better find something else worth talking about, because the war is over and done with. Now we are just left with a quagmire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I don't think it's ancient history, but this brief bump in *'s polls from
Saddam's capture is a temporary illusion. Every day more G.I.s are being killed. It's getting to be about two or three a day. Obviously getting Saddam is backfiring in terms of violence against US. The only way * can permanently turn Iraq into a winning issue is by pulling out before November and turning over the control of Iraq to the U.N. and the Iraqis.

Clark's my preferred candidate and I believe that Iraqmire will prove to most voters that we need a strong anti-war Democratic leader with military know-how to clean up the mess, and restore America's international status. That candidate is Clark, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I appreciate what you are saying...
... and forgive my bluntness.

I think there is much too much focus upon how we got into this mess. Important, yes, but largely irrelevant. We must deal with our present situation now, where U.S. troops and Iraqi guerillas are taking turns killing each other. Dean's campaign, IMO, seems to be too focused on the past.

BTW, if Kerry drops out of the race, Clark is my second choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Thanks for your respectful tone. It's seen far too infrequently here.
Personally, I think Kerry is a fine man and would make a wonderful president. But I was deeply disturbed by his IWR vote, as well as his support of the Patriot Act. Granted, many of those in Congress were bamboozled by this hard right administration that will, IMO, stoop to absolutely anything in its plan to completely take over our country. Still, many of we less informed citizens knew *'s claims that Saddam was an immediate threat to be a thinly veiled excuse for an imperialistic power grab, particularly in regards to obtaining Iraq's oil reserves.

Still, if Kerry gets the nomination I will enthusiastically vote and work for his election. In all but one or two areas he has never disappointed me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Tell that to the families of the dead soldiers...
JEEZ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Gladly.
And I would tell it to the families of the dead Iraqis. The truth hurts sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, lying to Congress and the American people may be "old news"
to you, but it's a Big Issue for some of the rest of us. It goes to the foundations of our Democracy. And when we see the lies of the Business Community, the Financial Markets and the Government, it's no "small matter, of old news" to be forgotton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. You are confusing me. My point was that the war is NOT over.
I was and still am against the Iraq war, and consider the killing of Iraqis by Bushco to be a war crime of the first order.

Now, please, explain what you mean by "Ancient History."

As a professional historian, this remark strikes me as a classic example of short-attention-span thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. It does hurt but it's not the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
19. (Edit) Oh-it was an NYT peice--thanks for the link..
Edited on Fri Dec-26-03 11:21 AM by edzontar
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. Says who?
WASHINGTON, Dec. 25 — President Bush's campaign has settled on a plan to run against Howard Dean that would portray him as reckless, angry and pessimistic, while framing the 2004 election as a referendum on the direction of the nation more than on the president himself, Mr. Bush's aides say.

Some advisers to Mr. Bush, increasingly convinced that Dr. Dean will become their opponent next fall, are pushing to begin a drive to undercut him even before a Democratic nominee becomes clear. But others said the more likely plan would be to hold back until after the Democratic contest had effectively ended, probably no later than March.

As a Bush strategist put it, Dr. Dean's rivals are "doing a great job for us" with their increasingly tough attacks on him.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/26/politics/campaigns/26REPU.html?ei=5062&en=f70dde43205be535&ex=1073019600&partner=GOOGLE&pagewanted=print&position=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. That is *THE* planned r-wing strategy...
as reported in their own voice today!

If people want optimistic and forward thinking, Dean's the man.

I hope you'll learn enough about whoever becomes the Dem candidate to be able to refute such a ridiculously feeble argument as the one the GOP is planning to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
22. Bush: "I'm running this country into the toilet..."
"But at least I'm hopeful!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. Case In Point-Dean's Rsponse To Matthews Query RE:Amercian Exceptionalism
Matthews essentially threw Dean a soft ball and Dean proceeded to launch into yet another attack on Junior and what he's done to the country... rather than present his own Vision of a Successful America and its roll in the world.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC