|
Leadership
This next election isn’t really about who has the best policy, or who has the most legislative experience, or who has the nicest hair. (I think we all can agree that the answers are: all of them have good policy ideas; Kerry, Kucinich and Edwards in descending order; and Al Sharpton). But again, that isn’t what the election is about. This next election is truly about leadership. Who, of all the candidates currently in the race, is best equipped to lead America into the new millennium, when that leadership is already three years overdue?
I say this, because it will not matter who has the best tax reform ideas if they cannot get them implemented by a hostile Congress. It will not matter who has the best success strategy for the war in Iraq if they cannot get the world leaders to agree to those plans. It will not matter what environmental reforms are desired; what plans for freeing America from dependence on foreign oil are drafted; or how the president will stop the constant flow of jobs to foreign countries if he cannot get the Congress to follow his lead. The answer to the question posed earlier is quite simple, really, as it is the only answer. The candidate who is best equipped and best prepared for the challenge of leading America into a bright future in a hostile world is Wesley Clark.
He has the practical domestic experience of governing hundreds of thousands of troops and their families; improving substandard education, health care and crumbling infrastructures on military bases; turning around underperforming divisions until they become best in class. He has practical foreign policy experience that the other candidates can only dream of: conducting high-level military negotiations with foreign powers in pursuit of peace; conducting war if necessary, when the conditions for peace were not met.
Many people like to make light of the war in Kosovo, as it was “only” an air war. However, the war in Kosovo was a war fought and negotiated by Wesley Clark on multiple fronts: military, diplomatic and domestic. He had to fight and negotiate with the U.S. government just to have our military forces intervene to stop the genocide. He had to negotiate every day with all nineteen member nations of NATO in order to assure that all nations were in agreement on strategy, bombing targets and the ongoing diplomatic negotiations with the Serbian government. He had to fight and negotiate with his own command structure (the Pentagon and the White House) simply to ensure he had a workable plan for success. And he did succeed.
The success of Wesley Clark in his military career was not accidental, it was due to his strength of character, and his strength of leadership. America needs that strength of character, and strength of leadership now. America needs Wes Clark.
|