|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Raya
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 01:57 PM Original message |
Chomsky Doubts Dems Under Kerry Can Survive RW Propaganda Onslaught |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhunt70
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. He's probably right about what will happen but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastknowngood
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
2. A clear mind and shrewd analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. A No-Brainer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pocoloco
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. If Impeachment. Conviction. Incarceration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eaprez
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. RW Propaganda Onslaught. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kalian
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think he's dead on.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. I think the pubs will steer clear of Vietnam Era |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raya
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. May get a hint Sunday. Bush may come out swinging re his patriotism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. They, and Rove, don't need a direct attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
7. Could you imagine the RW Propaganda Onslaught on Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:32 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. On Kucinich? No, actually I can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. uhhhhh ... he a librul! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. The spin would be he bankrupted Cleveland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 06:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
52. I'm hesitant to give examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. actually old school conservatives like kucinich becausehes anti patriotact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseMen
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
51. I don't think we would have had any chance. Only Kerry or Clark credible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
8. Sad that Chomsky, a peace advocate, can't envision defending Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. sorry the predictions didn't go your way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. successfully 'defending' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnOneillsMemory
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Chomsky knows the crimes power will commit to hang on. Sad but true. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. I guess you didn't read the original post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:03 PM Response to Reply #20 |
43. But tell me, was Chomsky really hand wringing like the post implied? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:18 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. I think people are already a little too comfortable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. Surprise, surprise - and people like me will have to suffer because Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. patricia92243, you made the comment twice today... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frustrated_lefty
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. What can I say? Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
21. Noam Chomsky is so influential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Thanks for clearing that up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. "Fuck all y'all"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
40. I apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Damn, you're tripping this much and we haven't even heard from the Pukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. I expect it from them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:08 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Well, I'll not be one criticizing anybody for protesting a war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. This post does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Hey there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikehiggins
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. Sandy, nobody is berating Kerry for what he did in working with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sausage of Death
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
62. We need Noam Chomsky to introduce Kerry at a fund raising event. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
capriccio
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. Half right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Didn't that tripe go out with McCarthy and the HUAC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. HEY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. no, but ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. oh for crying out loud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikehiggins
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
29. Wow! Chomsky better watch out if he keeps talking about Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Jane Fonda, ,how tired is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
41. Our vets aren't cowards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
46. McCain was defending Smirk's military record?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saoirse
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 06:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. What a lick-arse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sausage of Death
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:43 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. For McCain, the Country comes before the Party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseMen
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
32. Progressives have to Get Damn Serious About What's At Stake For RW Estab |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 03:57 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. I completely agree...we're looking at the trees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logansquare
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
42. I saw one of the supermarket tabloids had a story on Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raya
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
44. Chomsky thought Dems were HOPELESS before Kerry Emerged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
49. I really no longer care what Chomsky thinks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Sat Feb-07-04 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
50. Guess we should have nominated Lieberman while we had the chance then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nashyra
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 06:46 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. The line about the capture of bin laden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. but we'll have Evan Bayh as Kerry's VP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Oh. Is that confirmed? Or is that just rumor? Or do you even know? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
53. I can't believe this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bain_sidhe
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:05 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. "Chomsky's outlook on U.S. affairs is usually so positive!" SNORT, giggle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saoirse
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
56. It'll backfire on them if they try this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
59. He is correct of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
61. Didn't Forrest Gump Speak At The Rally, Too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
63. That's not what I heard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
65. Then let us hope that Chomsky is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC