|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:09 AM Original message |
Deleted message |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
1. I don't find it offensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas_J
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
22. I find sheeple most amusing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:42 AM Response to Reply #22 |
38. I can't agree with you more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoppin_Mad
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:57 AM Response to Reply #22 |
47. A Kerry supporter calling other supporters "sheepie" - That's rich -nt- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas_J
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:10 AM Response to Reply #47 |
60. Sure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
34. PeteNYC - maybe you should be more specific about the accusations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. Whose floating these notions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumguy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. yes it is baseless and insulting - eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waldenx
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. Why do you care? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
5. I don't think it's necessarily valid, but I don't think it's offensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mydawgmax
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
6. Tired of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
50. WA's Gov. endorsed Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:03 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Wooing Dean supporters to Kerry's camp is definitely a joke in my eyes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:11 AM Response to Reply #50 |
61. ROFL at that post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woofless
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:18 AM Response to Reply #50 |
89. That's funny, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
7. there are alot of paranoid, dopey people here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. Of course they're offensive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_Bonanza
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
9. Right on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
10. shame on those black voters in Detroit who had their precints switched |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
73. I don't know anything about the Michigan, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:14 AM Response to Reply #73 |
88. The accusation was that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:54 AM Response to Reply #73 |
94. How about the DoveTurnedHawk post about the Kerry supporter he caught |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
11. Offensive and predictable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
12. its predictable but kinda sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
13. Well, I find it offensive that when people report inconsistencies they see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. I don't see a shred of evidence in your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:31 AM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Read the article on CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:40 AM Response to Reply #24 |
35. It's kinda hard to read with their heads buried in the sand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:44 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. I agree with you 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:45 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Oh, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:59 AM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Well doesn't this sound familiar... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:13 AM Response to Reply #49 |
65. Well done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuelahWitch
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:13 AM Response to Reply #49 |
87. Go KaraokeKarlton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:41 AM Response to Reply #49 |
101. You're missing the incredibly obvious difference, KK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:12 AM Response to Reply #101 |
107. Oh, there's something that makes it "different" all right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:16 AM Response to Reply #107 |
109. "why is half of Maine's votes left unreported" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:23 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. I never said that I didn't find voter irregularities to be a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:28 AM Response to Reply #107 |
112. Meanwhile, you completely ignore posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sistersofmercy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:58 AM Response to Reply #40 |
80. Trust me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #80 |
105. Yeah, no kidding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. I am familiar with the problems in Detroit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:17 AM Response to Reply #41 |
68. I have yet to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
86. Good! They are going to have the press conference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:34 AM Response to Reply #17 |
27. No, it's eyewitness reports from people who have seen it firsthand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:41 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. Circumstantial? You must be joking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. There are VALID claims of serious problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:51 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Fine. If there is all this evidence, it should be easy to prove. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:01 AM Response to Reply #45 |
52. You mean just like it worked in Florida? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #52 |
58. You're not helping your argument by completely changing the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:24 AM Response to Reply #58 |
72. LOL! You are assuming a recount would actually reveal honest results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:48 AM Response to Reply #72 |
76. Well then, what do you suggest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #76 |
82. Paper ballots, no caucuses which are easy to manipulate, and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:07 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. No electorate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:40 AM Response to Reply #84 |
113. Hey, sounds like a dictatorship! No electorate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:16 AM Response to Reply #58 |
108. My state hasn't voted yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:44 AM Response to Reply #52 |
102. Gore didn't lose Florida by 20%. And you have yet to provide one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaraokeKarlton
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:22 AM Response to Reply #102 |
110. Only half of Maine's results have been reported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:41 AM Response to Reply #110 |
114. "where people have posted the results from their caucuses" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrats unite
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
14. Ignoring me won't make my question go away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
15. What are you talking about?!? How is vote counting offensive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
16. The charges are automatically without merit because its YOUR guy, huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:47 AM Response to Reply #16 |
42. we don't know who wins elections in the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
18. Ask those voters in MI who did not get to vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:34 AM Response to Reply #18 |
26. oddly enough it happened in an african american community again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:42 AM Response to Reply #26 |
37. Amazing, the way that works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revcarol
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
19. I noted disturbing irregularities in the Washington race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:09 AM Response to Reply #19 |
85. The numbers reported have no effect on anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas_J
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
20. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
33. That's not true, Nick, it'd be a different group making them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
21. Truth hurts, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoppin_Mad
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
23. Not if they're true - Here is one first-hand account from WA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
32. More anecdotes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporatewhore
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
25. so the voters who were disenfranchised should stop crying intheir tea cups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:01 AM Response to Reply #25 |
81. Let's see, Kerry said that,, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
28. No, because they're really a reflection of general discomfort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
29. More Humorous Than Offensive, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnitaR
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
30. Actually find it as one of the least offensive things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
31. It's just newcomers to politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoppin_Mad
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:53 AM Response to Reply #31 |
46. I've supported many a 'losing campaign' going as far back as McGovern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:12 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. OK, you're not a newcomer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:28 AM Response to Reply #46 |
90. What does "Hopefully for John Kerry" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HazMat
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
44. It's to be expected from certain types of people, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:57 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. 1600 technology experts, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:03 AM Response to Reply #48 |
54. I didn't realize this conversation was about BBV. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:01 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. It's offensive when............... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:05 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. When I see some actual evidence of a problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:08 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. It's called research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:14 AM Response to Reply #57 |
66. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:21 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:23 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Deleted message |
GodHelpUsAll2
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:31 AM Response to Reply #70 |
74. That's what I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:42 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Sorry buddy, I do my research. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:55 AM Response to Reply #56 |
95. Start here- Articles about Black Voter Disenfranchisement in Detroit: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoppin_Mad
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:04 AM Response to Reply #44 |
55. As is election tampering - Like Kerry's brother Cameron 1972 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zinnola
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
59. Wow.. you Kerry supporters are really really winning over Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:12 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. I'm not a Kerry supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:13 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. It's the voters who count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:04 AM Response to Reply #64 |
83. Are we not voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:17 AM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Edited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zinnola
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:24 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Please do not assume I think Kerry is evil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eileen_d
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:50 AM Response to Reply #71 |
78. No, I don't think that about you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgetrimmer
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
77. Question the general, Question the primary.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyeswideopened
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
79. NO, NO and NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
91. Maybe not offensive but a tad annoying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
92. I do have a problem with what happened in Detroit. It has nothing to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:58 AM Response to Reply #92 |
96. What did you hear one month ago? This is not ringing a bell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:00 AM Response to Reply #96 |
97. I worked on phone banking to get the vote out for the caucuses. While |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinoire
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:17 AM Response to Reply #97 |
99. That really angers me! I saw several posts and articles to that effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
93. You *Should* Be Offended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaglass
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
98. Since it appears that the scurrilous innuendo of fraud in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
republicansareevil
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
100. BBV and other problems with voting have been a topic on DU for four years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:44 AM Response to Reply #100 |
103. BBV is not an issue in Maine's caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxymoron
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:51 AM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
republicansareevil
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:58 AM Response to Reply #103 |
106. I didn't say "Maine" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
115. You Need to Have Grounds of Suspicion First |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:07 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Wow -- I Killed a 115-Post Thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC