|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
robbedvoter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:45 PM Original message |
Donations to Sen. Edwards questioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow. Talk about a baseless smear........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KC21304
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. And the debauchery of it ! Some of them had never given to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Distinction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Except that it's not baseless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edwards4President
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Of course, if the Ashcroft Justice Department is investigating a Democrat, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edwards4President
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. You DO realize that the "investigation" you cite is looking into the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Special Interests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sleipnir
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. It does sound suspicious, but then again, look at the source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edwards4President
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. You forgot to mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Law firm giving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. You wouldn't believe the stuff people Dug and Dig up on Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. Why does Edwards have a higher Fat Cat ratio? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Is that why there is no display of individual # of contributions on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. Let's be honest if Clark had this stuff going on there'd be an uproar here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. From who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. I've given to 350 to Edwards, I'm not a lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurtyboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
17. Please regard this as a bunch of hooey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC