http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?section=40&screen=news&news_id=30602Commentary by Bill Press
February 10, 2004
The White House bristles at allegations that Bush shirked his National Guard duties, which Republican Chair Marc Racicot calls a "new low" in politics. But there's one way to put the issue to rest. Let President Bush name one guardsman he met during the seven months he served in Alabama. If he can, the issue's dead. If he can't, it's a good sign he's lying.
In 2000, a group of former Alabama guardsmen offered a $3,500 reward to anyone who could remember serving with Lt. George Bush. Nobody came forward.
Is it, as Racicot charges, dirty pool for Cleland to raise this issue? Not at all. Cleland is a decorated Vietnam hero who left both legs and one arm behind on the battlefield. He lost his Senate seat when President Bush went to Georgia and accused him of being unpatriotic because, while he sponsored his own homeland security bill, he dared oppose Bush's version of the same legislation.
Fair is fair. If it was OK for Bush to question triple-amputee Max Cleland's patriotism, it's OK for Max Cleland to question George Bush's military service.
Bill Press is a political analyst for MSNBC and author of Spin This!