|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 12:54 PM Original message |
the shoe is on the other foot and they are begging for mercy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. Identical to Pelosi's 2004 Bill? What a bunch of lazy wankers. And |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. This should be sent to every rethuglican with a point for point rebuttal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
3. Just one question.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. The Dems are doing exactly the right thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. I hope they prove your theory right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Their "duty" is to see that the People receive "just" & "meaningful" representation? Hahaaaa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Pelosi shouldn't even consider it until she's had time to undo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Exactly. Some things have priority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. And undoing their damage should take at least the rest of their two-year terms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. I notice that there is no mention that the republican majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. She should make this very clear to the nation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. Did they sponsor a similar bill in 1996, in 2005 or any year in-between? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. When they had the power to do anything they wanted for the people, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. Ahhh, Republicans back in their natural habitat: Victimhood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. They played the victim even though they were in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave_p (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
15. Wimps! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mad_Dem_X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. F them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC