Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Operational Commander in Iraq: "may take 2-3 years to gain the upper hand in the war."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 01:52 AM
Original message
New Operational Commander in Iraq: "may take 2-3 years to gain the upper hand in the war."
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 02:06 AM by Clarkie1
By MICHAEL R. GORDON and JEFF ZELENY
Published: January 8, 2007

WASHINGTON, Jan. 7 — President Bush’s new Iraq policy will establish a series of goals that the Iraqi government will be expected to meet to try to ease sectarian tensions and stabilize the country politically and economically, senior administration officials said Sunday.

Among these “benchmarks” are steps that would draw more Sunnis into the political process, finalize a long-delayed measure on the distribution of oil revenue and ease the government’s policy toward former Baath Party members, the officials said.

As the policy is being debated in Washington, the new American operational commander in Iraq said Sunday that his plan was to send additional American troops, expected to be part of the policy change, into Baghdad’s toughest neighborhoods, and that under the new strategy it may take another “two or three years” to gain the upper hand in the war.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/08/world/middleeast/08strategy.html?hp&ex=1168318800&en=076ca8b44e7233b1&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Guess it will all depend on the "patience" and "resolve" of the American people now (never mind we still won't be talking to Iran and Syria, even as Iranian weapons are killing American soldiers in Iraq)...buck up, folks!.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. In addtion to the 2 or 3 they've already had?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Apparently so. Worse yet, it won't work.
The plan appears to be more of "stay the course." Without real regional dialogue there isn't even an iota of a chance of improving the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, you do remember Shrub said it would be up to the next
President to end the war don't you? He isn't going to change his mind on that one. I hate to see so many more Americans die for this AH, butI am positive his decision will guaranteea Democratic President in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just how many "terrorists" can we kill in 2-3 years anyhoo?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Another steaming load of crap to run out the clock for Junior
and place all blame on his successor(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. god this sounds more like Viet Nam every day
an utter debacle. a quagmire. a right wing authoritarian's wet dream...


...as long as we the people have the patience and will and willingness to sacrifice for just "one more surge"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Better make it 2 years...
Because the next president will not be president unless he says he will withdraw the troops, would be my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC