Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC says "Leading Edge" of surge has arrived in Baghdad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:41 PM
Original message
ABC says "Leading Edge" of surge has arrived in Baghdad

'LEADING EDGE' OF TROOP SURGE HAS ARRIVED IN BAGHDAD, ABC NEWS HAS LEARNED


http://abcnews.go.com?CMP=EMC-1396


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Must be a redeployment of troops from other areas.
Gee...I wonder what will happen next?

Would the insurgents scamper away from Baghdad to other, less-protected areas of Iraq?


Naaaahhh!!!


It's not like they have done that before. Well....maybe a few times...a few dozen!


Bush just escalated this tragic game of Whack-A-Mole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I read he was leaving Afghanistan in the lurch by moving some of the troops to Iraq
Afghanistan being screwed twice.

First abandoned in '03 when most of the troops were diverted to Iraq.

Now the puny number of troops in Afghanistan decimated again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know of one
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 06:36 PM by POAS
Air Force person going to Afghanistan to replace Army personnel. She is the daughter of a coworker and has been training for months to go to Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, the Decider decided a month ago, and lied to us about it.
What a surprise!

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's against the Consti, so time to impeach!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's just about that time, isn't it?
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. bush is a scoundrel
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. We should have known there was a reason he was putting off his announcement for so long
He was secretly starting the escalation because he knew the Congress would try to stop it, and he wanted to make sure that by the time he made his announcement it would be too late to stop it. We can still have the last word however. It is time to cut funding not just for the escalation, but for the entire war. The only funding that should remain in place is the funding to get our troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. How many Iraqi women and children do we murder this time? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. No wonder Speaker Pelosi said that her meeting with him was
more of a notification than a consultation. He had already decided on his plan of action and didn't want anyone to try to talk him out of it.

"Bush met with more than 100 lawmakers in the days leading up to the speech. Democratic leaders who met with Bush today complained that he didn't ask for their input before settling on a plan and writing his speech. ``There's a difference between notification and consultation,'' House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said outside the White House. ``This was notification.'' "

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=afrJ7FCCNqME&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC