Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charlie Rangle to introduce a resolution on the DRAFT tomorrow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 06:59 PM
Original message
Charlie Rangle to introduce a resolution on the DRAFT tomorrow
Good all these big mouth conservatives will be shacking in there boots if there kids get drafted. the draft would be between 18 to 44 year olds. i bet some CHICK SHIT Dem's will not back this resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dumb move. Lots of Dem voters strongly OPPOSE the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If people who run there big mouths support this war then we need a DRAFT plain and simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Absolutely...
How to end a war in one easy step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
6.  50,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and we had a DRAFT then.
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 07:35 PM by pnwmom
It took years of demonstrations, and an almost unimaginable number of American deaths, before the protests finally had an affect on the politicians who were determined to continue with the war.

A draft is no solution at all. That's why we got rid of it after Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I remember it well...
no preaching required. Allowing other people's children to die, or worse...live in hell for the rest of their days is no solution either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I've been doing as much, personally, as I can do. I'm not "allowing"
other people's children to die. I've been fighting against this war since well before it began.

And I am going to "preach" to anyone who thinks that a draft is a simple solution to the war. All it would do is provide Bush with more bodies for the war machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. the squeaky wheel gets the grease...
Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 10:24 PM by stillcool47
and as long as certain segments of society feel secure that their children are safe, their mouths will stay shut as they tsk, tsk, the complete destruction of others lives. In any case it's probably a moot point...as.. if it's necessary no segment of society will be spared...regardless of preaching habits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The purpose of the "preaching" is to correct misconceptions
that may cause progressive people -- especially those not familiar with history -- to support a draft.

Many DU'ers have expressed the naive idea that the outcry caused by a draft would immediately cause the Republicans to end the war. It didn't in Vietnam -- not until we had had years of protests and 50,000 deaths. And it won't work in Iraq either. It would just provide Bush with the means to further escalate and expand the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You're not making sense. The Democrats who oppose the war
would also be subject to a draft, or their children would be.

You can't start a draft and have it only affect the people who support the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. So my kids should go to get your revnege against theese war-mongers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. That's pretty much the idea
A lot of so-called "progressives" are into it.

I don't like this new faction of Democratic chickenhawks. I wish they'd join up and leave us out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I'm one of them and this will not help the Dems it will hurt them
Charles Rangle won't go anywhere but hurt Dems and Americans

My nephew in the air force will be excused early out of the air force so tell me WHY we need a draft Charlie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
4.  I'm a CHICK SHIT Dem then. Because I'll be damned if I support
any Democrat who votes to reinstate the draft. Particularly just at the moment that Bush is pushing for his Iraq war escalation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Pnwmom your not a member of Congress or the Senate that who I'm..
talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You said you bet that "chick shit dems" would vote against
the draft. I know you were referring to Congress members, not to me.

But I'm saying that I'll oppose any Democrat who votes in favor of the draft -- even if that makes me a chick shit dem, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. It's all bad timing.
Rangel would make the Democrats look bad if this thing is to be shoved through and I would move heaven and earth to get young people not to comply with any draft particularly with Bush wanting to escalate the situation in Iraq.



John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Charlie Rangel is full of shit...
Suppose the draft actually passed. How many of us would be ordered to report for duty and then shipped off to Iraq to die for this piece-of-shit police action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-10-07 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Maybe not this police action
but they will need lots of bodies in Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. DRAFT GEORGE P BUSH!
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 01:16 AM by Joe Bacon
Make that chicken go fight for his uncle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. charlie's bluffing. again. but it's getting people talking. again.
only problem is i tried to google this and couldn't find anything on it.

however, i saw him on tv today --i forget who he was talking to-- and he was saying he would put this on the house floor tomorrow (thursday)

i get it; if everyone had the same chance of going to war then we wouldn't go to war unnecessarily.

so i guess we should be building new jails because the jails will be overflowing w/the "draft dodgers" who will refuse to fight in these stupid ass fucking wars that murder people and make the war profiteers even more rich than they are already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. But it's only getting people talking about what a stupid fucking idea it is.
Since roughly 70% of the U.S. population is against the war, wouldn't it make more sense to keep the dialogue focused on how to have fewer troops in Iraq rather than supporting Bush by giving him more fresh bodies to work with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Just the distraction the pukes pray for, Rangle needs to get his TV time, another egomaniac hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Give it up, Chuck!
Nobody wants the draft! I hope it dies a quick death in the House. People with a brain should be railing against this. This would backfire and make the Dems look bad. Bushco could use this against the Democrats! SAY NO TO THE DRAFT!


John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Fucking moron
I don't know what he's trying to accomplish other than to get his ugly mug plastered all over the corporate media with the pundits portraying all dems as crazy as loons. If he's serious he's an asshole to encourage the SLAUGHTER OF PEOPLE under the command of a madman. If he's not serious he's just another grandstanding, pompous, ego maniacal fuck-wad politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Wow!
IMO Charlie Rangel is a very thoughtful and humble man.

He has a point: If everyone had to go to war, there would be much fewer of them.

Don't discount the potential good of his actions.

And remember, Rangel is an Korean War Combat Veteran. Therefore, the last thing he's wish to do is beat the war drums for Mad King George. Rather, he's trying to wake up the Republican (and some Democratic) war-mongers up to the fact that the next body bag flown to Dover AFB may contain their son or daughter.

I respect Rangel and, IMO, he knows EXACTLY what he's doing. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. The road to hell is paved with good intentions
Charlie's just adding another layer of asphalt with his cockamamie proposal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'm 18
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 06:08 PM by MATTMAN
and Rangle is a dumbass to introduce this bill. He will just enable Bush to wage more wars with the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. Pelosi needs to send this to the back of the legislative docket....
...and state unequivocally for the press that a majority of the Democratic Caucus opposes Rangel's legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. You can go fuck yourself if you think I should be shipped off to Iraq.
And unless you're fucking posting from Iraq right now, you can go fuck yourself for calling me a "CHICK SHIT" for feeling this way.

If you want people to die in Iraq, then sign up yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Draft
I would imagine that the rich Repubs will jump on this and reinstate the draft. Their kids never go.
Rangel has made a terrible mistake. I can't believe he's doing it.
We have a volunteer military right now. Even a person from a poor family is not forced to go to war. If they volunteer, that is their choice.

There are better ways to discuss who is in the military and why. Threatening to reinstate a draft is not the way to do it.
I'm not of draft age, but you can bet your boots on the ground I'll be resisting a draft for those who are of draft age. And any legislator who supports it will not have my vote ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E-Z-B Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. A draft will bring about a cultural revolution similar to Vietnam
It will get EVERYONE to finally pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Countdown_3_2_1 Donating Member (778 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. This is STUPID! Young Voters Will See Democrats as the Party of the Draft!
If you don't think people aren't watching these early days of a Democrat Congress then you are a fool.
The GOP will go to college campuses and claim, "Vote Democrat, get a draft!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
32. A draft is clearly a bad idea. Introducing a bill calling for one probably is, but that's less clear
That a draft would be a catstrophically bad idea I don't propose to discuss - only a fool could think otherwise.

However "should America introduce a draft?" and "was Charlie Rangel right to introduce a bill calling for a draft?" are not quite the same question.

There is no chance of this bill succeeding, it's purely a matter of playing politics, so the issue is not "is a draft a good idea?" but "will this help or hurt the Democrats?".

I think it will hurt them - empty political grandstanding is nearly always a bad idea - but the claim that it will help them is orders of magnitude less silly that the claim that the draft itself would be a good idea is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. Yes, let's load the GOP echo chamber gun for them
So much for any accomplishments for the first 100 hours - this will be the story:

"DEMOCRATS SUPPORT RESTARTING DRAFT"

Boy, I'm glad Charlie feels the need to "make his point." I hope he's proud of himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E-Z-B Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. A lot of people are missing Rangel's true intentions. DON'T JUDGE RANGEL TOO QUICKLY!!!
The passage of a draft would ensure a quick end to the war - it would be widespread disapproval from every corner of the country against Dubya and his war. I'm of draft age, never served in the military, and never want to. But I'm behind Rangel 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-15-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. Many of you are Cursing Charlie
and you're not understanding what will happen. The reaction that some of you are having is the same reaction as those on the other side of the aisle. Rangle wants the debate. If it comes to a vote most dems and repubs will vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Rangel is trying to set fire to his house
to get the debate going about setting fire to houses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenZoneLT Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
38. Woohoo! No way they can draft me!
I'll be 45 in a month! Suck on THAT, Mr. Charlie.

Oh, wait. Never mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC