Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It's the oil contracts, stupid!" Why the "surge"? This is why. It helps to know.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:13 AM
Original message
"It's the oil contracts, stupid!" Why the "surge"? This is why. It helps to know.
"New Oil Law Means Victory in Iraq for Bush"
    
By Chris Floyd (t r u t h o u t | UK Correspondent)

Monday 08 January 2007


   " I. Surging Toward the Ultimate Prize


    "The reason that George W. Bush insists that "victory" is achievable in Iraq is not that he is deluded or isolated or ignorant or detached from reality or ill-advised. No, it's that his definition of "victory" is different from those bruited about in his own rhetoric and in the ever-earnest disquisitions of the chattering classes in print and online. For Bush, victory is indeed at hand. It could come at any moment now, could already have been achieved by the time you read this. And the driving force behind his planned 'surge' of American troops is the need to preserve those fruits of victory that are now ripening in his hand.

    "At any time within the next few days, the Iraqi Council of Ministers is expected to approve a new 'hydrocarbon law' essentially drawn up by the Bush administration and its UK lackey, the Independent on Sunday reported. The new bill will 'radically redraw the Iraqi oil industry and throw open the doors to the third-largest oil reserves in the world,' says the paper, whose reporters have seen a draft of the new law. 'It would allow the first large-scale operation of foreign oil companies in the country since the industry was nationalized in 1972.' If the government's parliamentary majority prevails, the law should take effect in March.

    "As the paper notes, the law will give Exxon Mobil, BP, Shell and other carbon cronies of the White House unprecedented sweetheart deals, allowing them to pump gargantuan profits from Iraq's nominally state-owned oilfields for decades to come. This law has been in the works since the very beginning of the invasion - indeed, since months before the invasion, when the Bush administration brought in Phillip Carroll, former CEO of both Shell and Fluor, the politically-wired oil servicing firm, to devise 'contingency plans' for divvying up Iraq's oil after the attack. Once the deed was done, Carroll was made head of the American 'advisory committee' overseeing the oil industry of the conquered land, as Joshua Holland of Alternet.com has chronicled in two remarkable reports on the backroom maneuvering over Iraq's oil: 'Bush's Petro-Cartel Almost Has Iraq's Oil' (link*) and 'The US Takeover of Iraqi Oil.'

    "From those earliest days until now, throughout all the twists and turns, the blood and chaos of the occupation, the Bush administration has kept its eye on this prize. The new law offers the barrelling buccaneers of the West a juicy set of production-sharing agreements (PSAs) that will maintain a fig leaf of Iraqi ownership of the nation's oil industry - while letting Bush's Big Oil buddies rake off up to 75 percent of all oil profits for an indefinite period up front, until they decide that their 'infrastructure investments' have been repaid. Even then, the agreements will give the Western oil majors an unheard-of 20 percent of Iraq's oil profits - more than twice the average of standard PSAs, the Independent notes.

    "Of course, at the moment, the 'security situation' - i.e., the living hell of death and suffering that Bush's 'war of choice' has wrought in Iraq - prevents the Oil Barons from setting up shop in the looted fields. Hence Bush's overwhelming urge to 'surge' despite the fierce opposition to his plans from Congress, the Pentagon and some members of his own party. Bush and his inner circle, including his chief adviser, old oilman Dick Cheney, believe that a bigger dose of blood and iron in Iraq will produce a sufficient level of stability to allow the oil majors to cash in the PSA chips that more than 3,000 American soldiers have purchased for them with their lives...."

(MORE)

(updated version) http://www.chris-floyd.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=989&Itemid=135

(truthout.org - original) http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010807A.shtml

(discussion) http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x3073715

*(Note: link to report - http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/43045/ )

----------------------------------------

We need to know WHY this escalation of the war is happening, in order to more effectively oppose it and lobby Congress to stop it. I think this author--Chris Floyd--has nailed it. "It's the oil contracts, stupid!" The oil giants who run Bush and Cheney still think they can profit from the deaths of 3,000 U.S. soldiers, the maiming of tens of thousands, and the slaughter of over 100,000 innocent Iraqis, and secure the oil fields, with more of our lives and treasure. It is THEIR unconstitutional power that is behind this decision. The peoples' Democratic majority may oppose the war, but they are not immune to this power behind the throne, which brings me to the issue of why they have insufficient numbers to bring these tyrants to account.

It is useless to rail against "spineless Democrats" who compromise on "symbolic" resolutions against escalating this war, and don't seem to have the strength in numbers to de-fund this escalation--and to confront Bush/Cheney, Magna Carta style, on executive tyranny--when our elections are controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations, using "trade secret," proprietary programming code, with virtually no audit/recount controls, to "count" all our votes. The American people did everything they could to overcome this great handicap--an estimated 5% to 10% "thumb on the scales" for Bushites, warmongers and corporatists--and elected as many Democrats as they could, to stop this war. But Congress is STILL insufficiently representative of the American people--70% of whom want this war ended now. Even with top generals and numerous war hawks against the escalation, they can't seem to do anything effective to stop it. True, they have only been in office for a week, and may have legislative/investigative strategies that we can't yet perceive, but the horror of this escalation--Bush/Cheney throwing more "cannon fodder" into protection of the oil contracts and oil fields--is so great, that immediate action to de-fund the escalation is REQUIRED, by any reading of the law, the Constitution or common decency.

The Bush Junta's enormous malfeasance on global warming--one of the great tragedies of this Junta--is also one the keys to this escalation of the war. Why have we been pouring lives and treasure into securing Mideast oil fields for Exxon-Mobile, and NOT using these resources to convert to non-polluting alternative energy--something that the American people would accomplish in five years, in my opinion, with halfway decent leadership? Because Exxon-Mobile and brethren are now running our government. And this escalation, and the reason for it--as revealed by Mr. Floyd--makes this very clear, indeed. I think the best strategy for influencing Congress is to quote his article in all of our letters and communications, and to highlight THE OIL CONTRACTS in public protests--to let them know that we know--and to hearten and strengthen the good people in Congress, to resist this horrible decision, and the horrible coup that is behind it. Long term, we must--WE MUST!--restore transparent vote counting. Short-term, we can only hope and pray--and work tirelessly--for decency and the rule of law to prevail among the members of our semi-legitimate, partially representative Congress.

"It's the oil contracts, stupid!" should be our motto. And on the back of that sign, "Throw Diebold, ES&S and all election theft machines into 'Boston Harbor' now!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep.
It was always about the oil. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. But I Thought The Saudi's Didn't Want This Oil Pumped Out Of Iraqi.....
soil and into the market? They want it in the ground so that they can continue to keep the price of oil inflated.

Who's gonna win out - the Saudi's or *'s Oil Barons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hard to say, about the oil market, but I think this oil contract situation is the
"smoking gun" of escalating the war. Why would they be so adamant about continuing a losing war, and doing the exact opposite of what even war hawks are advising? Everybody and their brother was willing to help them out of this mess! Even Daddy Bush! It's because they PROMISED Exxon-Mobile & Co. the Iraqi oil fields, at Cheney's secret energy meetings in spring '01, and they are beholden to THEM. If they DON'T get those contracts signed, and provide "cannon fodder" for the Oil Giant takeover--at least until the private mercenaries funded by billions stolen from our treasury, directly or in tax cuts, can get into position--their oil buds will abandon them to the fate of an aroused public and its semi-legitimate Democratic Congress. I think their oil buds (and possibly other war profiteers) may have the goods on them. Blackmail and bribery are at work. Bush/Cheney are extremely vulnerable on a long list of the gravest "high crimes and misdemeanors" this country has ever seen, and we likely don't know the half of it. But somebody does. That's my feeling. And these guys need serious protection of a kind that only giant multinational corporations can provide these days--giant multinationals that control our public airwaves, purchase Congress critters, control election results, and can buy whole governments with no extradition treaties. So, in other words, Bush and Cheney are not free not to escalate the war. And these contracts are why. This WAS the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. K&R!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is so critical to understand. More discussion here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JunkYardDogg Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Iraqi Troop increase is directly related to the Oil Policy
This is a thug effort to intimidate Iraqi "Politicians" to approve the Iraqi National Oil Plan,
which lets BushReich Oil Corp Cronies loot Iraqi Oil Fields until the fields are bled dry
Today, during Condi's appearance before a Senate committee, she stated the the "Iraqi National
Oil Plan " (her words) will help Iraq recover and stabilize-no Senator grilled her on this "Plan"
I caught this on a short CNN coverage of the hearing and the air head CNN news casters didn't have a fucking clue what she was talking about
It is nothing but a scheme to loot Iraq
Private Oil Corps will engorge themselves on Iraqi Oil,
This is being funded and supported by the death of American lives and the depletion of the American Treasury
This is why it is so important to get all the info on Cheney's Energy Policy meetings
The BushReich has killed Americans so that the Oil Industry can obtain enormous profits
That is premeditated murder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. hard to get the oil out through a civil war, though
i'd imagine the american oil corps at the center of this policy don't have much faith its going to work out at this point.

who's going to protect the oil infrastructure? who's going to work for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CharmCity Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. U.S. troops and Kuwait
They know where the oil is. And there's a pipeline straight through Kuwait... this is in fact a better deal than exploring an area where they DON'T know where the oil is and DON'T have infrastructure in place.
As for the cost: The oil companies will simply mark up the price of the oil to cover the cost of protecting their infrastructure. That cost will be passed on to you and me. Unless, of course, you're ready to start walking everyone. Oh, and taxpayers (you and me again) will pay for the military. And in Bush's mind (or rather, Cheney's), I'm guessing, those who didn't participate in this little exercise in the Desert will come begging in time for oil, and it will be available... at a cost.
Yes, this is a high risk investment, but in the corporate view, it's the cost of doing business, which will continue to increase as oil becomes more scarce. And quite frankly, this country cannot operate -- cannot compete -- without a ready supply of oil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. they're not getting it out now, though
how will they after we withdraw & the country is run by moqtada?

we're going to withdraw, aren't we? aren't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CharmCity Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. of course not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is a MUST READ....
kick it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC