Restrictions for fed. funding of embryonic stem cell research lifted!
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:28 PM
Original message |
Restrictions for fed. funding of embryonic stem cell research lifted! |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-11-07 03:30 PM by jenmito
The House voted to lift restrictions for federal funding of ESCR, but two votes short of veto-proof majority...253-174.
|
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Two votes can be swayed or negotiated. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Nancy could twist some arms. :D
|
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Actually, the veto-proof number is 290. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Hey-you're right...the anchor on MSNBC said two short... |
|
But 2/3rds WOULD be 290. Hmmm...
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. this will throw a wrench into the plans of the pro life crowd |
|
Should they now commence with a protest against using embryonic stem cells for research which may lead to a reduction in human pain and suffering or should they proceed with their plans and rally in Washington and tell the president that they want more death, destruction and despair in Iraq? Its just so tough believing stuff.
|
BonnieJW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Now that scientists have discovered |
|
amniotic fluid contains usable stem cells, there should be no objection to the funding by anyone.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I watched the debate and... |
|
those in favor of it KEPT pointing out that only "embryos" from IVF clinics that were already created and marked for being discarded anyway will be used, and the opponents just ignored that over and over, falsely claiming it's creating life to destroy life. It's not. It's studying cells that WILL be thrown out no matter what.
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. "Creating life to destory life" |
|
could that logic be applied to parents of Marines and Soldiers? No disprespect to those folks or their kids as I am a Vet myself but conservative logic consistently boggles the rational mind. Throw it in the trash don't use it for research.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Very true. Even some "pro life" Repubs. (and Dems.) were saying they were voting for this bill because they ARE pro-life and this bill would give hope for a better life for many, using frozen embryos that WILL be thrown out anyway.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.