Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Bush turns to Dissenters on Iraq"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:40 AM
Original message
"Bush turns to Dissenters on Iraq"
Interesting article here about Bush doing and about face on de-Bathification and opposition to state-run industries destroyed during the intial invasion. Problem is, it's probably too little too late and it looks doubtful that the there is anyone in the Iraqi goverment who has the will and political power to really reverse de-Bathification. The sectarian strife may have reached too high a level for that now, and the administration is still refusing to talk with Iran and Syria and address the problem as a regional issue.



Bush turns to one-time dissenters on Iraq
Officials who derided early policies now asked to help save mission
Carol Guzy / The Washington Post
Updated: 54 minutes ago
First of an occasional series

<snip>

Timothy Carney arrived in Baghdad in 2003 to head Iraq's Ministry of Industry. He left two months later, disillusioned and frustrated with U.S. policy. He is now returning to Baghdad to coordinate the American reconstruction effort.

<snip>

The plan unveiled by Bush last week calls for many people who lost their jobs under Bremer's de-Baathification decree to be rehired. It calls for more Sunnis, who were marginalized under the CPA, to be brought into the government. It calls for state-owned factories to be reopened. It calls for more reconstruction personnel to be stationed outside the Green Zone. It calls for a counterinsurgency strategy that emphasizes providing security to the civilian population over transferring responsibility to local military forces.

Carney believes such measures could have been effective three years ago. Today, he worries they will be too little, too late.

much more here...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16612926/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. what ethics has a military viceroy the right
become so involved in a nations domestic economic/labor law. Next Bremmer might have appointed a Scalia to the Iraqi court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-14-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Even putting that issue aside, it was a stupid policy.
Edited on Sun Jan-14-07 02:10 AM by Clarkie1
By failing to support the state-owned industries, legions of discontented unemployed had nowhere else to go but the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC