Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2008 Electoral Vote Prediction:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:45 AM
Original message
2008 Electoral Vote Prediction:


Democratic Locks: 250
Wa - 11
Or - 7
Ca - 55
Mn - 10
Wi - 10
Il - 21
Mi - 17
Oh - 20 (you betcha)
Pa - 21
Hi - 4
Dc - 3
Md - 10
Ny - 31
Ct - 7
Ri - 4
Ma - 12
Vt - 3
Me - 4

Democratic Leaners: 45
CO - 9
Mt - 3
Ia - 7
Va - 13
Nh - 4
La - 9 (with enough ads, trust me.)


Democratic Maybes 68
Az - 10
Nc - 15
Mo- 11
Nm - 5
Fl - 27


It takes 270 to win. The easiest route to 270 after the 250 guarantee is:
Dem. Locks + Virginia (13) + Colorado (9) = 272
or
Dem. Locks + Virginia (13) + Louisiana (9) = 272
or
Dem. Locks + Virginia + Iowa (7) = 270
or
Dem. Locks + Virginia + New Hampshire (4) + Montana (3) = 270


Any non-Hillary (From a political science standpoint, she has baggage) Democrat will win in a landslide (300+ electoral votes). Only McCain makes it slightly more difficult for a Dem. in Colorado, Arizona, Virginia and a few other key 2008 swing states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
citygal Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. No republican president has EVER won without
capturing Ohio. Therefore, as Ohio goes, so goes the nation...I think it is blue for at least the next election cycle. (At least it now has a Democratic SOS.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. The reason for the non Hillary is that most dems will stay home if it's her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed, her negatives are too high,
and that's a liability to turnout. That's a sad but true, basic campaign/election rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. An assumption supported by what?
DU sentiment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateModerate Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ohio a lock?
That seems to be kind of a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Ohio is purple turning blue, but there are still ALOT of red pockets
that could turn out to bite us in the ass in '08. I know, I lived in a red pocket, I escaped that hell in May. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. No more GOP control of all the voting machines in Ohio. BIG difference.
Dean has worked to REBUILD Ohio's collapsed party infrastructure. Ohio is strong for us now, as it would have been in 2004 if Terry McAuliffe had actually done his job and secured the election process after 2000 as he had promised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Louisiana will be bright red in 2008
Sorry but that's the way it is. Despite the fact that the deadly incompetence came from Bush, Blanco and Nagin are Democrats and both have done a terrible job in the aftermath. Not only that but the people who were actually effected by the storm don't live here anymore for the most part.

And Ohio and Pennsylvania are by no means democratic locks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citygal Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The only thing encouraging about Ohio is that
Blackwell is no longer SOS and cannot "fix" the election. Not to bring up old news, but I still think Kerry won Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No argument there, Ohio will at least be fair this time and that is a huge help
Not to mention that Strickland and Brown will certainly be able to help turn out the vote for our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Plus Mary Landrieu usually votes with the pukes
It's sort of like a female Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I've interned for Senator Landrieu, her job is not easy
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 01:41 PM by Hippo_Tron
Lieberman is from a solid blue state and really has no excuse for what he does, especially since he's an active warmonger and even more supportive of Bush than some Republicans.

Landrieu has to get elected a far more complicated state that is becoming more and more red by the day. You would not believe the number of phone calls we got asking us to vote for the flag burning and gay marriage amendments and to vote to repeal the "death tax". The estate tax was the saddest part because people living in FEMA trailers actually thought that they would have to pay it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollin74 Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. What about NV
In my opinion, Democrats have a better chance of carrying Nevada than any of your "Democratic Leaners" (with the possible exception of Iowa)

I also have to agree that PA and OH cannot be considered locks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. PA will continue to go blue. Too much dissent in the
Philly suburbs with Bushler since 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I agree. We've voted Democratic 5 elections in a row I believe,
and my traditionally conservative district recently elected Patrick Murphy as our Representative. Rendell will likely campaign for the Democratic nominee, and everyone loves Rendell. I'm very confident we'll win PA in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasterDarkNinja Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. As a PA resident I can say that PA is definitely not a lock yet
PA has definitely been turning bluer lately, but it's not a lock yet. We may have won the senate and governor race by huge majories, but take a closer look at those elections.

In the senate we had Rick Santorum to oust, who was an extreme conservative and big Bush supporter, plus we ran a moderate that appealed to independent voters and couldn't be painted as too liberal for PA.

In the governor election Ed Rendell had done a decent job and was fairly popular among PA residents. Plus the antiBush tide that election certainly helped him. His opponent wasn't all that great either, and ran weaker ads compared to Rendell's.

I'd put PA under the leaning democratic catagory, since we've gone blue for the last 4 presidential elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vireo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wisconsin not a lock, either
It's always in play. MN is only slightly more reliable.

I would call NM a leaner, but not VA, which hasn't gone to the Democrat since 1964. LA is also quite a longshot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daylin Byak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Here are my predictions
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 04:16 PM by Daylin Byak
Divided in the sections of, good chance and in play

Good chance of winning

-washington
-oregon
-california
-Colorado
-Minnesota
-Wisconsin
-Illinois
-Michigan
-Pennsylvania
-New York
-Maine
-Vermont
-New Hampshire
-Massachusetts
-Rhode Island
-Connecticut
-Delaware
-New Jersey
-Maryland

States that could be in play for Democrats if we play our cards right

-New Mexico
-Nevada
-Iowa
-Ohio
-Arkansas
-West Virginia
-Virginia

Oh by the way since were on '08 predictions, I might as well make my predictions for the Senate since i'm here, here goes.

The Democrats will lost Louisiana hands down, Mary Landrieu will by loking for a new job come January of 2009. Out of all the Republican seats up for re-election the Dems have a good shot of picking up four seats which will be Colorado, Oregon, Maine and Minnesota and with the right candidates we could North Carolina is Mike Easley runs and Virginia if John Warner retires(then Mark Warner can enter the race and be the frontrunner)

Comments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. Warner or Webb for VP
I think if Warner or WEbb were the VP, we would win Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is awfully early to be predicting the
election. Chris M. had a guest from California who blatantly
stated. " McCain can beat Hillary in California." "There are a
lot of Democrats who will vote for McCain." I know not that
much about California, but I found this interesting information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hmmm. I'm getting a shaky feeling about California, actually.
But it's good to know you're confident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC