|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
texanshatingbush (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:26 PM Original message |
Repubs can't accept 2006 loss, circulate false arguments via email |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Unemployment is low because the Boomers are beginning to retire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Unemployement is not the issue -- it's wages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Oh, both can be looking at reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Very true. But demographics deemed that unemployment will go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. I don't know if I aagree with that. I happen to think the Shrub |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. It is demographics. Boomers are more plentiful than younger workers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n2doc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. It is low because they don't count many people who have stopped looking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. They don't count those people who are underemployed..and don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Unemployment is low because they changed the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. none of those survives an honest examination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebellious Republican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. Oh how I have longed to utter these words to the freepers.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Send him a copy of NanceGreggs post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I second this suggestion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. He buys this crap, yet you claim he is "a smart guy"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gizmonic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. "Not a single terrorist attack..." Not True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaBanty (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. Yes, more flannel talking points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 07:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Beautiful.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt-60 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
16. I accept only the data from my wallet and phone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuskiesHowls (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. Ok, quick and easy, point by point.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ktowntennesseedem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
19. Well you don't expect Repugs to circulate VALID arguments, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
21. Been discussed before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-16-07 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
22. One point that hasn't been mentioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-17-07 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
23. wow, how many outright lies is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC