Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Asked Rob Portman about the G-3 on C-span this morning!!(update! HELP! He wants me to call back!!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:24 AM
Original message
Asked Rob Portman about the G-3 on C-span this morning!!(update! HELP! He wants me to call back!!)
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 10:23 AM by Boxerfan
I was amazed I got through!. Frankly I wish I could have told him how well this economy was working for this unemployed mechanic-But...
I was able to get right in & ask him why the government stopped reporting the G-3. From my limited knowledge this is the hard accounting of paper currency printed by the government.
I also explained if we put America to work on jobs & energy independence we wouldn't be having such a hard time of it would we?.

What suprised me was he actually DIDN'T deny the G-3 was not being reported. He also aske I write C-span for a follow up. So I did.
"I called asking about the reporting(or lack thereof) in the reporting of the G-3 economic index. I'm no brainiac regarding finances but isn't this a recipe for hyper inflation?.

I appreciate your program & hope he can follow up on his promise to answer this question "offline".
Thank you."

I won't hold my breath-but if he does get back to me I'll post about it.....Sheesh-ME talking finances!. I will just say this is not my forte-I'm better off working with my hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I heard you and you sounded very well spoken!
Paul didn't know what the hell you were talking about! I thought you presented and explained the situation well. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks!. I just hope a few eyes were opened...
I have gotten through 3 times & it is never easy speaking on air...So I appreciate your comment. Also I could not have picked a worse topic. My freeper brother is a financial analyst & advisor-Hope he was watching(snark).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. We heard you too....good job! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. HELP!!!!! OMG He asked me to call him back!! It's a trap isn't it-Am I going to Gitmo??
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 10:18 AM by Boxerfan
Seriously folks-I need help. I have been asked to call him back & I'm in so far over my head I fear I won't present myself as well as I should. On the tinfoil hat side am I going to Gitmo now??

Oy... Anyhow-Should I call back? If I do what the heck should I say? I do have a hell of an economic tale to tell-Having risen from homelessness to having a family. Many lay-off's & opinion related firings due to managers that only listen to the bottom line....Where would I start??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kick for help n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. ROFL...Call him and let us know what is said and/or decided!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. stop tripping and google the money-supply thing
breathe. google. breathe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. This dude was Pnac before there was a Pnac is my guess...He worked for B1
I am sure I won't get anywhere confronting him. Besides he's a proffesional liuar.
I am curious as to his motivation to engage. I do have "advice" for him that I can speak calmly about-The need for energy independence & the jobs it would create is my favorite example.

How can I be constructive here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. You sounded great to me.
Talk from your heart, I don't think he expects you to be an economist. Just do what you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ok- I called...He actually had talked to his assistant about it
I explained my question regarding the G-3 again in as a specific manner as I could.Said " Just a curious citizen etc... Had the opportunity to ask & thought it was a pertinent questrion etc...". He said they would do some research & e-mail me back.
Once again, the fact it is not being reported was NOT denied & I phrased the question to allow for some doubt!

That was too funny talking to the "I'm sorry he's at a meeting in the White House now" Sheeesh. I ended the call with "God bless America" so hopefully I won't be indoctrinated to some fine detainment facility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Not to worry.
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 12:15 PM by acmejack
I used to visit GTMO regularly, it has a great beach, a low priced, well stocked liquor store, great fishing, outstanding diving, and before this current imbroglio, many family types actually sought duty there. I had a friend and business partner who did two tours there and loved it.

on edit: Just avoid letting them put you in a cage! When I used to go there they didn't have any Camp Deltas or such, no Army presence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gadz what a nube I feel like...It's M3, not G3...(wicki link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. don't feel that way. you deserve credit for calling and speaking out.
you drew attention to the matter also, which is what is needed. Don't sweat the details.

I heard you too. You were wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I thought you meant M3...
pick a point and stick with it. FOCUS! You'll be fine. Think "soundbytes". Practice out loud. Breathe. Don't forget you can and should use notes on phone/radio. You'll be mahvelous. Breathe.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boxerfan Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here is the reply I recieved....Not very convincing but they did answer!
We assume you were asking about the M3 measure of the money supply on C-SPAN this morning. The Federal Reserve stopped publishing M3 in March of 2006, but it continues to publish the other leading monetary aggregates M1 and M2. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve has explained that the reason for stopping the publication of M3 was because the benefits of the information it added to the other aggregates did not justify the costs of collecting and processing the information. This was a decision by the Federal Reserve, which is an independent Federal agency.

In the press release announcing the decision, the Federal Reserve stated: M3 does not appear to convey any additional information about economic activity that is not already embodied in M2 and has not played a role in the monetary policy process for many years. Consequently, the Board judged that the costs of collecting the underlying data and publishing M3 outweigh the benefits.

In Congressional testimony, Chairman Bernanke was asked about the M3 decision.

His response: "My understanding is that the Federal Reserve decided to discontinue publication of the monetary aggregate M3 because the costs of collecting and processing the underlying data were judged to exceed the benefits. The Federal Reserve will not withhold the M3 data from the public; rather, it will no longer collect and assemble that information. The Federal Reserve will continue to collect data for and publish the monetary aggregates M1 and M2 and their components.

The benefits of continuing to publish M3 appear to be minimal, because M3 has not been actively used in the formulation of U.S. monetary policy and, at least within the Federal Reserve, has not been found to have much value for economic forecasting. Discontinuing publication of M3 will allow the Federal Reserve to terminate certain reporting forms that currently must be filled out by depository institutions, lowering the costs of such institutions. Costs at the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board will similarly be reduced as these particular reports will no longer need to be processed and analyzed.

I view the periodic reappraisal of the costs and benefits of reports as a useful discipline to ensure that the reporting burden on financial institutions is kept to a minimum."

For further information, we recommend that you contact the Federal Reserve.

Best,

The Office of Management and Budget


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC