|
We assume you were asking about the M3 measure of the money supply on C-SPAN this morning. The Federal Reserve stopped publishing M3 in March of 2006, but it continues to publish the other leading monetary aggregates M1 and M2. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve has explained that the reason for stopping the publication of M3 was because the benefits of the information it added to the other aggregates did not justify the costs of collecting and processing the information. This was a decision by the Federal Reserve, which is an independent Federal agency.
In the press release announcing the decision, the Federal Reserve stated: M3 does not appear to convey any additional information about economic activity that is not already embodied in M2 and has not played a role in the monetary policy process for many years. Consequently, the Board judged that the costs of collecting the underlying data and publishing M3 outweigh the benefits.
In Congressional testimony, Chairman Bernanke was asked about the M3 decision.
His response: "My understanding is that the Federal Reserve decided to discontinue publication of the monetary aggregate M3 because the costs of collecting and processing the underlying data were judged to exceed the benefits. The Federal Reserve will not withhold the M3 data from the public; rather, it will no longer collect and assemble that information. The Federal Reserve will continue to collect data for and publish the monetary aggregates M1 and M2 and their components.
The benefits of continuing to publish M3 appear to be minimal, because M3 has not been actively used in the formulation of U.S. monetary policy and, at least within the Federal Reserve, has not been found to have much value for economic forecasting. Discontinuing publication of M3 will allow the Federal Reserve to terminate certain reporting forms that currently must be filled out by depository institutions, lowering the costs of such institutions. Costs at the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board will similarly be reduced as these particular reports will no longer need to be processed and analyzed.
I view the periodic reappraisal of the costs and benefits of reports as a useful discipline to ensure that the reporting burden on financial institutions is kept to a minimum."
For further information, we recommend that you contact the Federal Reserve.
Best,
The Office of Management and Budget
|