Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keith Olbermann just posed the question to Craig Crawford of CQ, re: Clinton and Obama, .......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:22 PM
Original message
Keith Olbermann just posed the question to Craig Crawford of CQ, re: Clinton and Obama, .......
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 08:25 PM by marmar
are concerns about "lack of experience" really proxies for concerns about gender and race? He pointed out that by the time the two would run, they'd have more experience than any of the last few presidents.
Interesting question. Crawford didn't think that to extensively to be the case, and made the argument that in the states Dems need to win, it likely won't matter anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...and Craig's response was ?
He and Keith are a great team....what a beautiful set-up. Go Keith :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Crawford didn't think it was extensively so....and said that in the states the Dems need to win...
It probably won't matter anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Good safe Craig answer :)
Thanks :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. And, the corporate media is trying to trap one of them into saying something derogatory about the
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 08:28 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
other.

Sheesh, in the meantime Brownback and Rudy G, get minimal coverage that which they get is civil or neutral. I want to hear what each of them think about the other. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Fortunately
They've avoided the trap thus far. Good point about McCain and Giuliani, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. when you concider that Edwards has less experience that the other two.
you gotta wonder if it is. but, I personally know of quite a few dems who will not vote if hillary is the nominee so, she may not carry the states that kerry did.
Obama has 12 years when you remember he spent time in the state...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I would rather have Edwards than the other two, anyway.
Natch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Craig's blog leans Edwards....
though Crawford "tries" to stay bipartisan :evilgrin:

http://www.crawfordslist.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dan Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'd be willing to bet that the
Democratic party will run Clinton & Obama (in that order for President & Vice president) in 2008. Watch....Bush has killed the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. One nation, under Lockheed, with options and profits for some. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'd take that bet
If I were a betting man, I'd bet Edwards/choose one Sebelius,Napolitano,Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Edwards is running an interesting campaign. He is postioning himself very well.
That would be a bet that I'd take, although if Gore throws in his hat, all bets are off, for me! MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC