|
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 09:32 PM by Lord Byron
I'm currently reading this book called The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America.
Here is a passage that just struck me:
"Indeed the more you look at the Democrats who sought the presidency in 2004, the less left-wing they seem. Dean's remark that he was more of an Eisenhower Republican than a red-blooded liberal might have been made by any of the leading candidates. None of them proposed any dramatic extension of government; most of them pushed positions firmly to the right of Michael Dukakis, let alone George McGovern. Edwards, another multimillionaire, got most of his financial support from his fellow trial lawyers-and stressed his appeal to white Southerners. Lieberman was even further to the Right-a religious moralist who condemned Bill Clinton's adultery, supported the Iraq war, and for a while even made friendly noises about education vouchers. Clark had been a Republican before morphing into a left-wing Democrat in the frosts of New Hampshire. He boasted about voting for Reagan and as recently as 2002, gave a speech praising Bush and encouraging people to back the GOP. (It is hard to imagine any left-of-center party in Europe turning to the army for its leader). Even the last great hope of American liberalism for 2008, Hillary Clinton, seems to have begun a voyage back to the center, decking herself in hawk's plumage."
The authors, I believe, write for the Economist, a Blairist magazine. Do they have a point? I think so. I think I'll vote for Kucinich but I'm largely undecided. I came across this passage just now and felt like sharing it. What do you guys think?
EDIT: Oh I found another quote I liked: "These days, American politics is a sport played between the center Right against the Right. From an international perspective, Democrats are now LINOs-Liberals in Name Only. Compared to even Tony Blair's Labour Party today, the Democratic agenda is still downright conservative."
|