Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cunningscam's demand for bribes put troops in (even more) harm's way

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:06 AM
Original message
Cunningscam's demand for bribes put troops in (even more) harm's way
Casualty of War
By John Rippo, San Diego


Wednesday, Jan. 17, 2007 | I would offer perhaps a dissonant perspective to the loss of U.S. Attorney Lam which concerns the case of Duke Cunningham.

My newspaper, ESPRESSO, once reported the tale of a local man who developed a landmine destroying device nicknamed the "Armadillo." This was enthusiastically received by the Marine and Navy specialists who tested it -- it took a licking and kept on ticking -- and it eventually progressed to the office of Duke Cunningham who then sat on the committee for military appropriations.

Cunningham's words to the inventors were to the effect that if "they couldn't bring anything to the table" they couldn't expect Cunningham to support the Armadillo. There, the chances for the simple, cheap and effective machine stopped cold. When last I saw it, the Armadillo sat under a tarp in the San Diego machine shop it was made in.

But what did that mean to the U.S. troops engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan? Many of the IEDs that kill and maim them are made in the forms of landmines -- that could be destroyed safely by the Armadillo. ESPRESSO once published a photo of a ten-year old Iraqi boy who found one of these the hard way, and whose mutilated body will form one more testimony to a mines' effectiveness in the pathology journals. That boy and the soldiers cruelly mutilated like him are the result of a venal lawmaker's failure to get his bribe.

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/01/19/letters/406casual.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. This scumbag may walk, too
since they've forced the prosecutor who was pursuing this case out.

They are terrified that the case against Cunningham, one of the most corrupt members of Congress, ever, will spill over into an investigation into the DOD-military contractor-GOP money laundering operation. Brent Wilkes's name has already come up more than once, and I fear he's only the tip of a very large iceberg.

That party has become a racketeering organization. They have a lot to answer for, and I hope they eventually will, once Stupid and his gang are out of power. I just think they're going to get people off in the meantime.

Cunningham may be one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd bet my next paycheck that Cunningham
gets a pardon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Duke's really, really sorry
He cried and everything. Don't you think he's suffered enough for getting caught? Lost his seat, and now he can't take no more bribes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC