|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
underpants
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 11:35 AM Original message |
"Democrat party" I have to ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. I see it as two-fold: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. That, and the snarl that it's always said with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
July
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Yep, that's reason #3: disrespect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. I'd like to think it is more mundane than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It's not mundane, it's a Rushism/Freeperism and now a standard for the worst Repukes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. ...and the President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spag68
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
4. IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rock
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well it may be as simple as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmd
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
8. It's also a regional thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. whoa. What region is that?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmd
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. SE Ohio n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
9. Here is the origin of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. ..and still more history... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Yes, the RW Republicans are STILL actively trying to change our language. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. It is wrong to call it the Democrat Party for the simple reason that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's just Rape-Publicans playing infantile games. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. I got this from a Google search: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Sounds good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
15. Using the noun form as an adjective is obviously meant as a slur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Allyoop
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 02:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Much ado about nothing IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
July
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Simple grammar here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montieg
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
17. The most recent manifestation of this slurring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
22. It is purposefully an epithet. I am frustrated bec the Repubs have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. No the "Rat" thing doesn't register verbally. It's just that "those Democrats" is a phrase in smears |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. Here's A Good Article On This By Ruth Marcus: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath
![]() |
Fri Jan-19-07 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
26. Good New Yorker article on the subject ; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan
![]() |
Sat Jan-20-07 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
28. I dont worry myself about that stuff .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC