|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:25 PM Original message |
Newsweek poll: Edwards is our strongest candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nice try, but way too early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
42. Nope, Edwards stands for fiscal sanity much like Clinton did in '92 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. He's the only "conventional" Southern White man candidate for the time being..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. I don't think the division will be as you suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. you are wrong about a lot of things in that post, and I'll point out a few.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. you are one aggressive person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. You are simply not impressed with facts, and that's not really my problem.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 07:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. much more reasonable post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. Of course he isn't interested in facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. It absolutely is not. And this jealous bitterness towards Edwards is unbecoming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. First - my dislike for Edwards has absolutely NOTHING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. It's your right to support whomever you please. But you have no right to denigrate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:42 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. I do when they keep ignoring facts that have been spelled out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Why you must be the DECIDER. People can look at the same set of facts and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. It's offensive when people can't see the forest for the trees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. It's offensive when people won't allow others to have an opinion different from theirs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #51 |
61. It's offensive when people promise to find Pelosi Jr's quote and never do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. Kewl! Go Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldingrockwarlord2 (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. No to Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. Take a look at Mark Crispin Miller's book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. EDWARDS / CLARK 08!!!! THE RIGHT CHOICE FOR AMERICA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. That will never happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. Friday on Dkos, Wes Clark Jr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Given what happened to Dean, it may be dangerous to be the front-runner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark E. Smith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. I don't think there is much doubt that our nominee .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
52. Then my husband, my parents, his parents and I will be voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark E. Smith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 06:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. Cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJCher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Edwards will be our next president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Well there are a lot of folks who think that Romney's got charisma too.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jcrew2001 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Edwards lost every debate he was in last time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 04:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Plus Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 06:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. I respect your opinion regarding his performance in debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. There was clearly a lot to like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. That is simply an untrue statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. "Many folks feel he won the debate with Cheney." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. Excuse me but in any upcoming '08 debate the R candidate will have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
53. Well, in all fairness, being a good personal injury attorney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Red Zelda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
9. He will be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. The media is not ignoring Edwards....give me a break..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #23 |
62. It's all Obama and Clinton, unless the Washington Post puts on A1 a story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
57. The media ignores Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alhena (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
11. Disagree, a "poverty" platform isn't a vote-getter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
45. That's a laugh. It's still the economy, stupid. That's Edwards ticket just like '92 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. Worthless poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
16. Those polls also said Elizabeth Dole will beat Gore at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
17. Good thing its early and the campaign has not started yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArnoldLayne (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
20. I have to agree with that especially with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
21. The results against Guilliani |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
22. I agree it's too early |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
28. Well, if you believe all this early |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
29. Nobody is the strongest candidate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
32. Edwards is a marathon runner ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
33. Agreed. Edwards or Clark. Or Gore if Gore runs. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Gore ain't gonna endorse Hilary, I can put money on that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 06:05 AM Response to Reply #33 |
65. Gore is keeping his options open |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
34. In my own mind, I have narrowed it down to Edwards or Hillary. Still have not decided which one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhombus (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-20-07 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
35. Yeah, a generic poll two years out means everything.... yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
election_2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
37. Why is it that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. Sadly, I don't believe this poll is meaningless and Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
38. At this point, I really don't think these polls mean anything at all. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AJH032 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
59. oh god no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-21-07 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
60. Yet the Washington Poll didn't even include Edwards in its poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
63. Edwards or Obama - Hillary? don't want two for one...this time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
64. Trying to determine the "strongest candidate" from poll numbers this far out is silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC