Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warner offers "less confrontational alternative" to the nonconfrontational, non-binding Biden res.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:37 PM
Original message
Warner offers "less confrontational alternative" to the nonconfrontational, non-binding Biden res.

BREAKING: Sen. John Warner To Introduce Resolution Opposing Iraq Escalation

Sen. John Warner (R-VA) will introduce a resolution today “making clear that he does not support the President on increasing the troop levels in Iraq” and calling escalation “a mistake,” CNN’s Dana Bash reports. Warner’s resolution will be cosponsored by Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Ben Nelson (D-NE).

Warner, the former Armed Services Committee chairman, is a “very influential voice when it comes to military matters,” Bash reports, and until this fall had been “whole-heartedly behind the president and the war.” His new resolution “certainly…is not going to sit well with the White House.” Watch it:

Snip...

Warner said last week that Congress must move swiftly to address President Bush’s new strategy. “Each of us are pained by the casualties that we are taking. We cannot dither around on it.” Warner’s bill is viewed as a less confrontational alternative to the Iraq resolution backed by Sens. Joe Biden (D-DE), Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Carl Levin (D-MI).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. The race for milktoast! Love your title, BTW.
Less confrontational than Biden????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Less confrontational? It would have been nice if Warner had
joigned the already fairly toothless version that Biden put out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. John Warner has been a nonentity at
the dance his whole career. It is definitely time for him to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harveyc Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why isn't anybody, but a very few, in Congress addressing ...
the 130,000 US combat troops we have stuck in Iraq right now?

Playing politics while the lives of our soldiers are at stake. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. What? I didn't think it could get much softer than the Dem's current one. Unbelievable.
Dither around! What does he think he is doing if not dithering around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. the lil' chimp really is in a pickle now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. this is actually good news
believe it or not....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes. This fractures the GOP in the Senate...
which we need to get anything done in Congress. Mitch McConnell must be mighty mad at Warner right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC