Woof. . . .All '08 threads are going to go poof

[annabanana]

I't barely '07 fer crisake

I know, I know.... "ignore is my friend"

[bling bling]

1. If you use ignore thread today it's gonna be slim pickins tho! :)

ARE THERE any threads that aren't about 2008? I don't think I've seen very many.

[annabanana]

2. They begin to surface once some of the clutter is removed..n/t

[Deep13]

3. Who do we think will run in 2012?

:hide:

[Renew Deal]

5. Chelsea Clinton and George P. Bush

Duh :evilfrown:

[bling bling]

7. You just gave me yet another reason to hope a Dem wins in 2008.

If a Dem wins in 2008 it will make for a much more peaceful 2010-2011 around here.

Or maybe not.....

[Bjorn Against]

8. Whoever wins in 2008 will be up for reelection

I know there was some sarcasm in your post, but I have seen many other posts discussing 2012 that are not sarcastic. To me it seems absolutely ridiculous to talk about running a new candidate in 2012, while we are trying to get someone will be up for reelection in 2012. So I suppose once people realize that they will be asking about 2016, and obviously it is way too early to know what serious candidates we will have that far out.

[Deep13]

9. In 2028 will a reanimated McCain run against a zombie Jimmy Carter?

Hey, I'm just asking!

[DaveinMD]

11. if we lose this year

Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley is sure to run. Governor Schweitzer of Montana as well.

[saltpoint]

4. Lotta political junkies on DU and other blogs.

Bless 'em all.

[stillcool]

6. I find it mind-boggling...

there's so much interest in candidates and who one will vote for, but none in insuring that the votes count. I guess it really doesn't matter who wins or loses, it's all about the game.

[Redneck Socialist]

10. The primaries will be over in about 14 months

best get crackin'

(and I'm only being partially facetious here.)

[More Than A Feeling]

12. DU looks very different with all the GD/GD:P candidate threads ignored.

I kind of like it.