|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
The Sushi Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 07:46 PM Original message |
Poll question: Is Hillary a member of an American Ruling Elite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. Senator Clinton don't show me nuthin' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHEN CRABS ROAR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Amen to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes. So were TR, FDR, Ike, ER, Acheson, Harriman, etc. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. DLC insider and part of the group trying to control our party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. the bush family and the clintons are nothing alike. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 07:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. True enough. You gotta be born a Bush. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nebula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Not part of the ruling elite? Could have fooled me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Which votes are those? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Still waiting for that reply eh? 95% of Hillary bashers are unable to back up their claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. 95% lifetime ADA rating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. If the Clintons are "ruling elite", it's because they earned it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
9. No, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. I voted "Yes" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k_jerome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
11. she is a Sith Lord. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. She's powerful to be sure but I don't believe she's dedicated to evil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes; most high-level politicians are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
13. no. the actual ruling elite are FAR wealthier and FAR more powerful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-22-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. the Bush family in no way resembles the Clinton family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sushi Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
16. 57 Yes - 21 No so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sushi Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. 62 yea, 22 no, and one who does not care! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
20. technically, as one of only 100 Senators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
21. If she is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-23-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
22. All senators are, by definition. It's not something to be ashamed of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sushi Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
24. 73 by 25%... my that is almost 3 to 1!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sushi Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. 79 to 26!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
26. BEHOLDEN to the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icnorth (954 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 08:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Rupert Murdoch Loves Hillary Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
28. no..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeblue (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
29. Political Science class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mayflower (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-26-07 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. Definitely. She is for the Corporations and NOT We the People. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC