Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And what the heck was Bush meaning talking about a "civilian volunteer corps"??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:15 PM
Original message
And what the heck was Bush meaning talking about a "civilian volunteer corps"??
He did say that, right? An American version of the French Foreign Legion? Is he going to ship off criminals and illegal aliens to fight for us? Can anyone shed some light?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Legitimizing the mercenaries.
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 11:18 PM by Drum
They have a wider latitude, and I think they have more legal protections from any wrongdoings, in addition to the hefty paychecks. In short, it's the army without the unity and honor of training and uniforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a more repressed, angry, white guy version of the Peace Corps or AmericaCorps.
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 11:17 PM by Heaven and Earth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. More money for KBR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Blackwater Battalions
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 11:22 PM by C_U_L8R
The monkey's own privatized Army.
Did you see the faces of the joint chiefs?
It seemed a big surprise to them too.
I've never seen a group of old men collectively
go "HUH???" at the same time like that before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stonecoldsober Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I had to laugh when i heard that
Like he's going to get anyone to sign-up. Everyone knows they'd be on the next flight to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. The difference is, they'll be driving hydrogen powered humvees.
He certainly likes to discuss odd stuff that'll never happen in his Sad State of the Union readings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harveyc Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another way to say draft? ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:20 PM
Original message
My first thought was mercenaries, my second thought was draft.
I hope we don't have to get either.
Dimson really scared me even more when he mentioned that idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harveyc Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. I thought daft ...
since mercenaries also cost money, the Pentagon could just increase pay for the military to increase enlistments. I can't really figure out what the hell he was talking about!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I read in the paper that they were thinking of sending
prisoners to fight in Iraq.I assumed that was what he was referring to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. kerry talked about that too - serving the country for two years
this was something being thrown around during the last presidential election - not new stuff - both sides have talked about this - I remember Kerry mentioning it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. That gave me the creeps
more than anything else he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mercenaries are too expensive - this could be like National Guard
but with no military benefits, and not bound by the Geneva Convention. If the idea is to station these civilians in war zones, but they are not trained or armed for combat - what a bloodbath that would be. In urban warfare, everyone is in the battle zone, whether they're working as a cook, a secretary, a paramedic - whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. If Reagan & Poppy hadn't dismantled the Peace Corps
it would already be in place and doing the job that a DEMOCRAT, John F. Kennedy envisioned for it some 45 years ago. of course, who knows what dimson really has in mind as its' job function.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porkrind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. I figured it was more of the corporatizing of the military
replacing soldiers with corporate mercenaries. That way when they are killed, it goes unreported. Also, they have fewer rights. I think *'s goal is armies of armed corporate wage slaves fighting corporate wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. They can also however, get away with a lot more abuse
because they aren't subject to court martial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. is this like his "mandatory volunteer service" of a couple of years ago? or something completely
different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. To me, this was one of the scariest tidbits of the entire speech.
It was kind of mixed in with a bunch of other things and will go unnoticed by most. He wants mercenaries a la Blackwater is what he wants. He scares the hell out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I agree....
He sure didn't explain it very well (which always makes that scarier with a BushCo speech), but the implications do seem to be something along the mercenary lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Make_Mistakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think I know where this might be going. During the Condoliezzalot
hearings there was talk about a group of individual, please forgive me, but I can not remember the term used to describe them. They are training up xxx (not known term) to be used in Iraq.

The gist that I could get is, they NEED teams of people to assist in developing the Iraqi governmental infrastructure. The Iraqi's need help in governmental operations support, people to assist in the non military/governmental type responsibilities. For example, the Judiciary, how to set up, manage and operate a Dept. of Justice, or Interior, or Treasury.

It was discussed during Condi's testimony.

I also, think there was discussion on DU about trying to send US Gov't employees to do this work, like a draft of non military personnel.

They have established a quick study course in Arabic, from what I could pick up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. it was a really wierd
non-explanation

either a trial balloon for something sinister, or else a wild hair someone threw into the soup without thinking it through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hell no, he won't ship off the illegals
He and his cronies need them for cheap labor, and to force down Americans' salaries so his rich friends can pocket the difference. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kosmo Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. Sign up at you local compound.
Civil Volunteer Corps Needs You!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Hi Kosmo!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SanCristobal Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. I'm pretty sure its nothing like anyone posted so far.
Bush probably got the idea from Wesley Clark (http://www.clark04.com/misc/003), and some of the details of the plan can be found here: http://proceedings.ndia.org/6100/russell.pdf . It sounds like a way for the military to stock up on civilian specialists they normally don't have enough of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. See here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ronnie Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
25. My husband turned to me and said,
"Ah, a Peace Corps for war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. Bush Scouts? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. civilian volunteer corps = citizen solders = the draft nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC