Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards aces Hannity & Colmes appearance (Video here!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:36 PM
Original message
John Edwards aces Hannity & Colmes appearance (Video here!)
Edited on Thu Jan-25-07 08:46 PM by JohnLocke
VIDEO HERE
----
From Newshounds:

I have to admit that when I heard John Edwards would be coming on Hannity & Colmes last night (1/23/07) to discuss Bush’s State of the Union speech, I was a little concerned he might not be prepared for Hannity’s bullyboy bravado. I was wrong. Edwards’ straight-talking, humanitarian attitude quickly laid to rest Hannity’s gotcha questions. It didn’t hurt that Hannity was less of a blowhard than usual. With video.
Edwards was refreshingly candid but also more politic rather than partisan. He diplomatically pointed out where he agreed with President Bush yet still managed to damn him with elegantly faint praise. For example, Edwards said he welcomed Bush’s energy and health proposals but called them “small, baby steps” instead of the “transformational” actions he thought necessary.
(...)
Hannity asked, “Would you take a no new tax pledge? …Do you think Americans are overtaxed or undertaxed?”
Rather than tapdance around the questions, Edwards said right away that he would not make that pledge because the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy have created “huge problems.” Edwards continued by saying that the question of being overtaxed or undertaxed is not black and white, that some people are overtaxed, like the middle class, but that top earners, like himself, are not.
Hannity trotted out his well-worn statistics that "the bottom 50% of wagearners only pay 3.8 % of the federal tax bill. The top... 10% pay nearly 70% of the tax bill."
Rather than attack Hannity’s stingy, blame-the-poor attitude, Edwards said that he took advantage of America and what it has to offer. “I think those of us who have done extraordinarily well” have more of a responsibililty to give back.
Hannity had no answer for that.

The rest and video of the appearance here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards is a trial lawyer
No one can outflank him. He's too sharp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wain Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. A trial lawyer as president
And a one-time senator refusing to stand for re-election. Interesting. I wonder what it would be like. I'll bet different. What the heck. Look at what we've had lately.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Didn't most of our presidents have a law degree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Big difference between a trial lawyer who has to think on his feet
and a corporate/real-estate/tax/divorce/wills & trust/government lawyers
who can sit in an office and prepare their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Edwards is a lawyer
He could certainly handle a putz like Hannity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. What, Edwards is on FOX news!
What is the world coming to?

Seriously though, I thought Edwards did alright; I doubt any Dem will be making any sort of ridiculous "no new taxes" pledge. He correctly picked up on the growing discrepancy between the classes, as I was also pleased Webb did in his SOTU message.

Hannity was certainly uncharacteristically throwing softballs, but Edwards still responded to the quetions well. It will be interesting to see how Democratic candidates differentiate themselves, as I think there is likely to be a lot of agreement on tax and economic policy, as well as the need for universal healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. One negative -
"Edwards said he welcomed Bush’s energy and health proposals "

I haven't looked at Bush's energy policy, but the health on is a mess.
-It will tax anyone who gets insurance paid for by an employer. Than money funds providing health care for those that don't have it.
-This is done via tax deductions. A deduction is useless if you make too little to pay much in taxes.

I assume this will not get out of the Senate Finances Heathcare subcommittee - which I assume the place the tax law will be written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He answered wisely.
His response demonstrates diplomatic skill and civility. That is just what we need to counter the blustering, foolish right that is now in power. His genuine willingness to listen and debate will completely disarm the extremists.

He has the personality to bring the country together. And his accent is genuine and very down home sounding.

Plus his message rings so true. No one can deny what he says about the economic injustice in our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree with Edwards economic message.
And I would like to add, I was very glad to hear Webb hitting the same themes Tuesday night. Its not just Edwards message, its the position of most Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Not exactly....only the golden health coverage by employers costing
more than $15,000 per year get taxed. I have nothing to worry.
My employer pays less than $8000/employee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick (nt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. it is just so impressive

how much more polished and knowledgeable edwards
is now than he was in 2004.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC