Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What presidential homes are the most vile and disgusting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:10 AM
Original message
Poll question: What presidential homes are the most vile and disgusting?
Since some people are making an issue of John Edward's* new home outside of Chapel Hill, let's rate just what over homes owned by Presidents.

Which residences are just over the top!


* I know, Edwards isn't President...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. None of these people ran as the main advocate for the poor, a populist. That's the rub. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I was reading about Haye's presidency .
He lost his second term because he wrote some pretty negative stuff about the 'trusts,' and the vast acculmation of wealth by those who don't need it. I was flabergasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It was a different time. Due to the mass media, people's behavior
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 09:23 AM by ShortnFiery
such a purchasing large mansions is put before their constituents' faces in a heartbeat.

No, it's not fair but Edwards only has to look in the mirror for blame - a man as astute as himself should have seen this coming like an out of control freight train. :shrug:

I like him! Really, he's very thoughtful and intelligent. I like him a lot, just not for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. FDR and The New Deal...
All the Founding Fathers were wealthy, slave-owning land owners...that also wanted a free America. If you read the Declaration of Independence, you certainly can find advocation for the poor.

FDR was very wealthy...yet pushed through the New Deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. This is NOW. Many of us are disgusted by ostentatious demonstrations
of wealth, a la Enron Executives.

This undercurrent of populism is composed of many people who do not IDOLIZE such excesses. To the opposite, I've distanced myself from fellow local democrats whose homes are dripping with statues and baby grand pianos. It's excessive and sort of nauseating albeit we also could afford some drippings of wealth without going deep in debt. I donate to the local homeless shelter and cook meals a few times a month for shut ins within our Parish. The money we have in savings is NOT to spend just so we can show off to the neighbors. :eyes: That's, IMO, America's problem, feeling like we have something to prove to each other. :shrug:

It's not just me and I feel as the poor get poorer, those who throw their wealth in our faces will be resented.

BTW I never cared for the Kennedy dynasty and Kerry doesn't make an effort to throw himself out in a public light like our latest Princess Paris Hilton. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. advocation for the poor.
and the property requirement for voting? Not sure what advocate means. Maybe Jefferson. The fairness of early America can be demonstrated by Shay's Rebellion and how the VanderBilt family enslave all of the Hudson Valley, is my belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
venable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. It's a shame FDR didn't care about the poor
(sarcasm emoticom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. You don't have to BE poor to be an advocate
In fact, if you hope to be an effective advocate, it is pretty important that you not be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't have enough knowledge to answer
So I can't offer an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. can we define over the top.
Not sure how it defines itself. Over the top can be ostentatious, or in loud taste like some say of Graceland. Or maybe dump like Bush II. ? Maybe this is a loaded question. Bush II is everything vile and disgusting. He is a criminal. Before, after, and during his presidency. If it's vile, Bush II qualifies. One thing. Since it appears most universities don't want the Bush II library, it might have to go to Crawford, near his home.
Can't believe Tx. "A and M," Aggies are not doctraire enough to want his library full of lies and distortions.
.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. It is meant to mean "fancy", "elegant"...
If you've ever toured any of these presidential residences, you can see how loftily the owners lived...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't have a problem with any of them - I DO have a problem with the way the press characterizes
Bush's house v. others:

For example, throughout 2004, we heard:

"John Kerry's multi-million-dollar Beacon Hill mansion"
"John Edwards' multi-million-dollar Georgetown mansion"
"George Bush's Crawford RANCH"

Excuse me?

Bush's "ranch" is a multi-million-dollar spread - and, in fact, I bet if you picked it up and plopped it down on Beacon Hill or in Georgetown, it would be worth much more than Kerry's or Edwards' homes. Not only that, but everyone knows that Bush bought the estate in the late 90s right before he ran for president in order to perpetuate his rough-hewn "man of the people" image, which is pure crap. Yet the press never talked about that - instead, they helped to advance that myth even going so far as to allow the Bush folks to orchestrate their backdrops for standups whenever they reported from the ranch - I mean, really - does anyone believe that that old bale of hay and broken down wagon are really integral parts of Bush's property? I'll bet you a dime to doughnuts that the rest of the "ranch" doesn't look like that.

Rant over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Absolutely
The MSM was always saying how Kerry's multimillion dollar residence was somehow an issue. Now Edwards' lifestyle is in question... But the poor little ranch that Bush hangs out in is just a peaceful, bashful slice o' American simpleness...

Here's some info on the little 'ol ranch:

"Prairie Chapel Ranch is a 1583 acre (6.4 km2) estate located seven miles outside Crawford, Texas. It is the home of President George W. Bush. Then-Governor Bush bought the land in 1999 shortly after earning a $14.3-million profit from the sale of the Texas Rangers."

"Bush and his wife had David Heymann, an associate dean of architecture at the University of Texas at Austin, design a 10,000 SF (930 m2) honey-colored native limestone single-level home on the site. Over half of that square footage is from a ten-foot-wide limestone porch that encircles the house. The house was built by members of a religious community from nearby Elm Mott, Texas and wasn't completed until after his inauguration.

The passive-solar house is positioned to absorb winter sunlight, warming the interior walkways and walls of the residence. Geothermal heat pumps circulate water through pipes buried 300 feet deep in the ground. A 40,000-gallon underground cistern collects rainwater gathered from roof urns; wastewater from sinks, toilets, and showers cascades into underground purifying tanks and is also funneled into the cistern. The water from the cistern is then used to irrigate the landscaping around the four-bedroom home.

Bush added an 11-acre man-made pond that is stocked with 600 bass and thousands of bait fish."

http://cryptome.org/bush-ranch.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. The corporate whores have continued to
perpetuate the myth that chimp's Crawford digs are modest. A Google search for images turns up an article from 2000 that claims this is the house:



which we all know is total bullshit. It is or was an old house on the property, but it's more than likely been bulldozed by now.

Here's an aerial shot of the property. Doesn't look the same does it? I see a rather palatial structure and a huge pool nearby. There isn't a published up close photo of any of it. Have to keep up the myth that chimp is a man of the people. What crap.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bush's White House. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Definitly the pig farm full of pork and fueled by beans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. I find all extreme excess distasteful in this day and age of environmental awareness.
Edited on Sat Jan-27-07 10:51 AM by Clarkie1
It wasn't an issue back in the day, but it definitely is now. Edwards has shown a real lack of sensitivity and awareness. I don't see how he could ever be a great leader on environmental issues of this. Great leaders must lead by example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. What if Edwards' home used geothermal, solar and other green technologies?
I have no idea what green technology is in his home, nor do I think it's any of my business...but...I'm going to go out on a limb and say that he probably would use some type of green technology in the home...

Even the Crawford ranch uses solar and geothermal technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. It is your business if you are contemplating voting for him.
And yes, I would expect such an extravagant home should at the very least use the latest in green technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Rancho del Reagan
Former President Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy are selling the ranch Reagan used as his Western White House to a conservative political group, CNN has learned. The closing is scheduled for Tuesday and the price is more than $5 million.

The Young America's Foundation, a group which promotes conservative politics on college campuses, is buying the piece of American history. They plan to turn one of the most famous pieces of political real estate into a retreat for young conservatives.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/04/20/reagan.ranch/

The living room contains paintings of cowboys and Western landscapes, as well as Reagan's jar of jellybeans, still within arm's reach of the couch. The Reagans' branding iron hangs on a wall, as does a clock bearing the President’s name. In the kitchen sits Nancy Reagan's spice rack, still filled with the poultry seasoning and onion flakes that the first lady used for the Thanksgiving dinners the Reagans held at the ranch each year of his presidency.

The master bedroom contains two leather bound Bibles on a wooden side table; the quilt on the bed bears the initials NRR (Nancy and Ronald Reagan). Right next to the bed are two phones: one is a rotary dial and the other is a white phone without any dial or buttons, connected directly to the Secret Service command post near the house. The closet still holds Reagan's cowboy boots, several hats, and a dozen or so shirts and jackets that Reagan frequently wore on the premises. Nancy's "western" wardrobe, complete with jeans and straw hats, hangs on the opposite rack.

http://reaganranch.yaf.org/tour/home.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. The "Western San Clemente" (Crawford)
Yes, techically the real San Clemente is even farther west than Crawford...but not psychologically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. I nominate Monticello - not only was it built by slaves but
Jefferson did such a poor job of managing his land that he ended up bankrupt. No one has ever said so, but I suspect that his incompetence meant that all of his slaves were sold off and scattered once he died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Jefferson was a hemp farmer...
...so maybe he forgot to pay the bills.

Actually, if you ever get a chance to visit Monticello in C'ville, VA, it's a pretty fascinating place.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. Monticello is "vile and disgusting"? It's an american landmark.
This place amazes me sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. I didn't say it was vile and disgusting...sheesh...
Mostly, if you caught it, it's meant to be sarcastic. I personally have been to most of the places mentioned and find them pretty fascinating. The point was to show that Presidents have had wonderful homes and still could be great Presidents...with the exception of Buchanan and Bush...and maybe John Quincy Adams.

Don't form a kneejerk reaction without seeing what the intention of the poll was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Didn't catch the sarcasm, and neither did most voters in the poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's of no issue to me.
Most politicians live in luxury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. We should be protesting the $500,000 Bush Liebrary.
Oops, I didn't spell "library" correctly. Haha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC