Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unions sue Bush Dept. of Labor over worker deaths (50 deaths, 400,000 injuries tied to OSHA’s inacti

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:02 AM
Original message
Unions sue Bush Dept. of Labor over worker deaths (50 deaths, 400,000 injuries tied to OSHA’s inacti

http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/10372/1/354/

Unions sue Bush Dept. of Labor over worker deaths

Poultry workers typically stand shoulder to shoulder de-boning chicken breasts mounted on cones flying by at the rate of dozens per minute. They must wear metal mesh gloves on their non-cutting hands to protect them from the razor sharp blades they and their co-workers wield at lightening speed.

But too often a worker who finds a hole in his or her glove might put off replacing it. Why?

While the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires employers to “provide” such personal safety equipment, the agency does nothing to prevent employers from charging their workers for it. For a low-paid poultry worker, the 80 bucks it costs for a metal mesh glove could be two day’s take-home pay.

A lawsuit filed Jan. 3 by the AFL-CIO and the United Food and Commercial Workers Union charges that the Bush administration is putting American workers in danger by stonewalling on enacting an OSHA rule originally scheduled to take effect in 2000 to ensure that employers pay for personal safety equipment (PPE).

“Workers in some of America’s most dangerous industries such as meatpacking, poultry and construction … are being forced by their employers to pay for their own safety gear because of OSHA’s failure to finish the PPE rule,” a joint statement by the two labor groups declared.

In 1999, during the Clinton administration, OSHA set itself a deadline of 2000 to implement a rule which would ensure that employers pay for the personal protective equipment needed to protect workers in dangerous jobs. In the succeeding seven years, as the Bush Department of Labor stalled, 50 workers have died and 400,000 have been injured due to the absence of the rule. These numbers come from OSHA’s own estimates.

“These are the most vulnerable workers — Black women, immigrant workers — the exact group of workers OSHA should be taking care of,” Jackie Newell, safety director for the UFCW, told the World. Newell explained that while in union-represented plants the workers are collectively able to enforce the employer’s responsibility to provide safety equipment, in nonunion facilities management even makes a profit from it.

Management has been interpreting their legal obligation to provide safety equipment as a responsibility to sell safety equipment. “These low-wage workers are in a double-bind,” Newell said. “We’ve heard of cases of management charging $15 to $30 for the required slip-proof rubber boots, and charging $1 a pair in vending machines for hearing protection earplugs that wholesale for a penny a piece.”

The OSHA PPE rule would require employers to cover the cost of personal protective equipment, including clothing, lifelines, face shields, gloves, hearing protection and other gear used by an estimated 20 million workers to protect themselves from job hazards.

The PPE rule was proposed in 1999 by OSHA after a ruling by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission that OSHA’s existing PPE standard could not be interpreted to require employers to pay for protective equipment.

“The new rule would not impose any new obligations on employers to provide safety equipment; it simply codifies OSHA’s longstanding policy that employers, not employees, have the responsibility to pay for it,” said the unions’ statement.



In 1999, OSHA promised to issue the final PPE by July 2000. In 2003 it failed to respond to a petition by the AFL-CIO and the UFCW. It has also ignored numerous requests for action by the Hispanic Congressional Caucus.

“Nothing is standing in the way of OSHA issuing a final PPE rule to protect worker safety and health except the will to do so,” said UFCW President Joe Hansen. “We are asking the courts to force OSHA to act.”

AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said, “The Bush Department of Labor should stop looking out for corporate interests at the expense of workers’ safety and health. Too many workers have already been hurt or killed.”

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, asks the court to issue an order directing the secretary of labor to complete the PPE rule within 60 days of the court’s order.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I sincerely wish the unions good luck on this one. I really do. But if you
look at worker's safety in general, or in the coal mines specifically, you'll see a bunch of corrupt and greedy bastards who are able to get any case or complaint in favor of the worker thrown out of whatever court or forum they're filed in.

OSHA as a set of safety rules and as a body to enforce them might as well cease to exist. And that is to the everlasting shame of our government and our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Even when Osha does assess fines,
they're nothing but a slap on the wrist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. OSHA is a remnant from the day when people believed that the country
should be run for the benefit of the people and that when you said the word 'government' you meant the American people. You know, as in "We, the People, in order to form..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC