Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the Republican Party are "traitors"...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:07 PM
Original message
Why the Republican Party are "traitors"...?
Because they have betrayed our Constitution and their duty to uphold the laws of the land. Simply put, they refuse to hold their "president" accountable for anything. As mentioned in the NY Times this morning ( http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/27/opinion/27sat1.html?_r=1&oref=login -
<snip> All of that was distressing enough. But in Friday’s Times, Adam Liptak gave an account of the way the administration — after grandly announcing that it was finally going to obey the law on wiretapping — is trying to quash lawsuits over Mr. Bush’s outlaw eavesdropping operations by imposing outrageous secrecy and control over the courts.

Justice Department lawyers are withholding evidence from plaintiffs and even restricting the access of judges to documents in cases involving Mr. Bush’s decision to authorize the warrantless interception of e-mail and phone calls. In one suit, Justice Department lawyers tried to seize computers from the plaintiffs’ lawyers to remove a document central to their case against the government.)

What can be said about the Republican Party other than that they have betrayed America? For six years, they rubberstamped everything that the White House wanted. It was as if we no longer had a Congress or a Senate but a King, or a dictator. Now that they are no longer in control, they are still intent on protecting the criminal acts and secrets of this Administration.

The people should ask: Is this the type of Party that we want in control of our government? Is this the type of Party that should even exist should be asked? They do not have the capacity to represent the people of this nation. They are dangerous and detrimental to everything this nation stands for. They are not "American" in any sense of the word.

I know it is prohibited from calling people "traitors" - especially when they represent a major political Party in our nation. But I challenge anyone to explain to me how they have not betrayed all of us? And they continue to do so as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. There is no good explanation to your challenge. They HAVE betrayed
not only us, but the whole world and the ideals that they claim to support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. However, Kentuck's observations are the basis for a beginning..
into the machinations into the Republican Party's secret agenda to subvert the Constitution for personal gain and possibly the ethnic cleansing of muslims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. No Problem.....
commit treason, you are a traitor!

Sorry....I mean Fucking Traitor!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Calling people "traitors" is prohibited??? Wow, I'm going to jail for sure....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hashibabba Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. They HAVE betrayed all of us and will continue to as long as
we allow it. Stay on the backs of your congressmen so they don't forget! They're all off to a good start (well, OK, the Dem ones), all we have to do is keep reminding them to get us out of this mess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Correction: "The Republic Party" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. republik or Republic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You are correct. The first one. Use it often and see how they feel about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC