Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Smithfield Foods will pay $1.1 million in back pay to workers it illegally fired for union organizin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:40 PM
Original message
Smithfield Foods will pay $1.1 million in back pay to workers it illegally fired for union organizin
Edited on Mon Jan-29-07 07:51 PM by Omaha Steve

http://www.laborradio.org/node/5162

Smithfield Foods will pay $1.1 million in back pay

Lede: Smithfield Foods will pay $1.1 million in back pay to workers it illegally fired for union organizing activity. Doug Cunningham has more on the story.

By Doug Cunningham

Workers at Smithfield’s Tar Heel, North Carolina hog processing plant may get another union election. Smithfield says it’s wrapped up an agreement with the National labor Relations Board to pay $1.1 million in back pay, plus interest, to workers fired by the company for union organizing. A federal court order relating to union elections held in 1993 and 1997 prompted the NLRB agreement. Hundreds of Smithfield workers stayed off the job last Friday after immigration officials arrested some workers outside the plant. The United Food and Commercial Workers union is attempting to help workers at Smithfield form a union. The company has violated labor law in efforts to intimidate workers to stifle support for organizing a union. Now Smithfield says it’s ready to hold another union election.

AUDIO story here: http://www.laborradio.org/files/lo/winsheadlines.ram

http://www.smithfieldjustice.com/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. And to think I was once a union hater.
But then again, I grew up with the BLF (Builders Labourer's Federation) and the Painters and Dockers. Both poster children (here in Australia) for what unions were not meant to be. (The BLF (under Norm Gallagher) were notorious for extorting kickbacks to keep a site open & the P&D for stopping work if they could show three spots of rain on a sheet of writing paper.)

The problem is that corruption has no favourites. IF there's a buck to be made by shafting one's fellow man, someone will attempt to make it. The only possible solution I can offer is that any and all meetings (right or left) must have a credible observer from the opposing camp. Exigencies may(must) prevent him from reporting on details. However, he has to be there to say that the subject and resolution are fair and above board.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC