I had a revelation today: I agree with Hillary Clinton!

[Clarkie1]

Poll question: I had a revelation today: I agree with Hillary Clinton!

Do you?

Hillary Clinton in Iowa: "Democrats should nominate someone that can inspire trust when it comes to National Security" because, she says, "Republicans will put up a strong candidate of their own" --KRNV News 4 (1/27/07)

[Tom Joad]

1. Clinton's policies are a grave threat to US security, and the world's so yes

i agree we can't let Hillary be the nominee.

[Clarkie1]

3. delete. nt

[Tom Joad]

4. I also agree with Wes Clark that we should be talking with Iran.

So cheers.

[Clarkie1]

5. I have taken you off my ignore list.

Perhaps we can find some common ground.

:toast:

[Clarkie1]

2. delete. nt

[goodhue]

6. No

I don't agree

[NobleCynic]

7. I bow to your sarcasm good sir

[Greyskye]

8. Not only yes

But HELL yes!

Go Wes!

[lvx35]

9. Yes, Hillary is right! Go Wes Clark! nt

[katsy]

10. I'm so nitpicky.

It would please me to no end if our nominees... all of them would just speak first person.

<<<"I will inspire trust blah blah blah">>> Stop dictating. Just talk to us like you're a human being with a message, not like my boss.

This isn't meant as a slam. Just a suggestion to the powers that be.

Just put me on ignore okay. It was a tough weekend all around.

[PFunk]

11. I agree with what she says...

...But I don't think she's the one to be that person.

[IndianaGreen]

12. It depends on what one defines as "national security."

Some will argue that enabling Israel's oppression of the Palestinians and her war crimes in Lebanon is one of the reasons why the US is its own worse enemy. Others will add that engaging in regime changing crusades in the Middle East, or in other countries, invariably result in the loss of innocent lives which in turn creates future terrorists.

We now know that America's testosterone driven foreign policy has blown back on us by our support of Islamic extremists in Afghanistan during the Afghan-Soviet war, to name only one theater of operations. Shall we mention the CIA coup in Iran that put the evil Shah back in power?

What this country needs is an open and free debate on what constitutes national security. From my own point of view, it is not the role of our military to protect and/or expand American corporate interests overseas. The military's role is to protect the American people, not to protect the same ruling class that is exploiting the American people.

[Rowdyboy]

13. I agree. However, I believe Clark, Edwards, Clinton, Obama etc could ALL

inspire trust when it comes to national security. As a long-time Clark supporter from mississippi, he's my favorite by far, but I support ANY one of our candidates who might get the nomination.